Dred Scott Descendants Draw Parallels Between 167-Year-Old Supreme Court Ruling And Modern America

On birthright citizenship, the Supreme Court originalists split on history and Trump

The conservative justices see 'originalism' as a guiding principle to prevent judges from changing the Constitution to adjust to changing times. But that flipped this year.

Appeals Court Allows Ohio to Enforce Social Media Parental Consent Law

(NaturalNews) A federal appeals court on June 18 reversed a lower court ruling and allowed Ohio to enforce a law requiring parental consent for children under 16 to...

Stephen Miller Pushes For ‘Hard Look’ At Banning Pregnant Visitors After Major Supreme Court Ruling

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court handed down a historic decision to uphold the country’s 14th Amendment, cementing the law that allows anyone born on U.S. soil to be considered an American citizen. The ruling immediately ignited a fresh wave of legislative pushback from Republicans, including Vice President JD Vance, who warned that the more than [] Stephen Miller Pushes For ‘Hard Look’ At Banning Pregnant Visitors After Major Supreme Court Ruling

State Supreme Court justices admit they WANT racism used in America * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh

Source link Wisconsin Supreme Court Two justices on a state Supreme Court admit they have to follow U.S. Supreme Court precedent and rule against racism, but at they same time

The promise of birthright citizenship is upheld by the Supreme Court

The U.S Supreme Court upheld more than 100 years of legal precedent on Tuesday that affirmed the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of birthright citizenship to children born to immigrants lacking permanent status. The court voted 6-3 to reject the Trump administration’s reinterpretation of the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, which reads in part: “All persons []

Supreme Court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter turbocharges presidential power

The U.S. Supreme Court – with its six conservative justices, three of whom were nominated by President Donald Trump – has recently reversed landmark decisions that have long guided American government and society. Over the last few years, the ...

Clarence Thomas shreds ruling that ‘devalues’ citizenship in Supreme Court dissent

Justice Clarence Thomas shredded the Supreme Court‘s ruling striking down President Donald Trump‘s birthright citizenship order on Tuesday, accusing the majority ruling of using an “alternative history” of the 14th Amendment and expressing dismay over how it “devalues” citizenship. The high court ruled 5-4 that the 14th Amendment provides citizenship to children born in the []

Could Trump’s Supreme Court battle rewrite what it means to be American?

The decision could reshape more than 150 years of legal precedent and determine whether children born on U.S. soil automatically become American citizens

Supreme Court birthright citizenship ruling 'a tremendous betrayal' says Heritage chief

Kevin Roberts, the president of the conservative Heritage Foundation, called the Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday upholding birthright citizenship a “tremendous betrayal of the public.” The Justices in the majority have inflamed the all-out assault on our sovereignty and cheapened the sacred value of American citizenship, Roberts wrote on social platform X. Universal birthright citizenship...

Supreme Court Deals Massive Blow to the Deep State, Reversing 90-Year Precedent in Humphrey’s Executor

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to strike down the 90-year-old precedent in Humphrey’s Executor that insulated deep state actors from even a president’s ouster. “Nearly 250 years ago, the Framers decided to vest ‘[t]he executive Power’ in one person—’a President of the United States of America,'” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion....

SCOTUS Gave the Government a “Blank Check” to Weaken Due Process for Green Card Holders

This Supreme Court term has no shortage of high-profile immigration-related cases. But as the justices wait until the last minute to rule on the more controversial ones—namely birthright citizenship—on Tuesday, they delivered a decision in a sleeper case that could have implications for millions of green card holders living in the United States. In a []

[Photo] NEW: The Supreme Court has reinstated a New York man’s murder conviction, ruling that [...]

NEW: The Supreme Court has reinstated a New York man’s murder conviction, ruling that federal habeas courts cannot overturn state convictions based on legal principles the Court has not clearly established.Justice Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson.

JONATHAN TURLEY: Birthright citizenship ruling leaves conservatives with only one path

The Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling upholds birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, with Roberts and Barrett joining liberal justices.

SCOTUS ruling on birthright citizenship could impact millions

Advocates say the court’s ruling could impact millions of people in the United States. The post SCOTUS ruling on birthright citizenship could impact millions appeared first on URL Media.

Amy Coney Barrett’s birthright citizenship vote drew a particular kind of backlash

The justice’s vote in the recent birthright case seems to have enraged some conservatives in a specific, and perhaps specifically revealing, way. The post Amy Coney Barrett’s birthright citizenship vote drew a particular kind of backlash appeared first on MS NOW.

4 surprising things to know about abortion in America since Dobbs

A confusing patchwork of state laws began to take shape hours after the Supreme Court ruled to overturn Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022. Here's where things stand now on the abortion issue.

Building A Movement Around Birthright Citizenship, One Grievance At A Time

Three Supreme Court justices have concluded that birthright citizenship isn't a right granted by the 14th Amendment. A fourth justice is on the fence. It's clear now that the Court could take birthright citizenship away in the not-too-distant future. The pseudonymous Bluesky poster who uses the name Richard M. Nixon is right: Barring changes to the Court you will see another go at birthright citizenship within 10 years. — Richard M. Nixon (@dicknixon.bsky.social) 2026-06-30T14:41:14.177Z Dave Weigel responds: If Rs win in 2028 and replace Sotomayor, it's gone. read more

The 2026 Supreme Court -- a ‘C Minus’ at Best

Photo Credit:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States_-_Roberts_Court_2022.jpg Supreme CourtBy Don BrownThe Supreme Court’s just-concluded term produced several important victories for constitutional principles. Unfortunately, two catastrophic failures dragged the Court’s overall performance down.

Rep. Chip Roy calls to pause immigration after Supreme Court ruling

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, ripped the Supreme Court for upholding the birthright citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment in an appearance Tuesday on Newsmax. “The United States Supreme Court issued an opinion today that is massively damaging to the national security and to the fabric of our country, and it is incumbent upon the United []...Click to read more

The Supreme Court Term That Handed Originalists One Of Their Best Years Yet

Every Supreme Court term produces headlines. This one produced structural change — the kind that will shape how power works in Washington, D.C., in statehouses, and in your own community for years to come. Start with the case that mattered most: Trump v. Slaughter. For 90 years, Congress could shield the heads of “independent” agencies — ...

Court Term Reflects Reagan, Not Trump, Priorities

Bloomberg Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr says the court's latest term largely advanced long-standing conservative legal priorities rooted in the Reagan era, while rejecting several Trump-specific initiatives, including broad tariff powers. Joining David Gura and Christina Ruffini on Bloomberg This Weekend, Stohr says the justices left unresolved questions over presidential authority to remove Federal Reserve officials, signaled potential future debate over birthright citizenship and agreed to hear major challenges to state assault weapons bans next term. (Source: Bloomberg)

The divided Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision exposes sharp rifts among justices

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court’s divided ruling that children born in the U.S. are citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment — even if their parents are in the country unlawfully or only temporarily — exposed deep fissures in the justices’ views on the issue and toward each other. The court’s two Black justices notably [] The post The divided Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision exposes sharp rifts among justices appeared first on Loonie Politics.

Dissecting the Supreme Court's Scary 'Birthright' Betrayal

Justice Samuel Alito warned the birthright citizenship ruling is

LIVE: Reactions to Supreme Court decisions after birthright citizenship, transgender sports rulings

The Supreme Court on June 30 rejected President Donald Trump’s attempt to redefine who is an American, striking down the limits on birthright citizenship that were a centerpiece of his hardline approach to immigration. The ruling landed as the nation is gearing up to celebrate its 250th anniversary, adding to the significance of a case that was already a blockbuster. Live updates on Supreme Court decisions: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/06/30/supreme-court-trump-birthright-citizenship/90060950007/ Sign up for our newsletter for the day's top stories, from sports to movies to politics to world events: https://profile.usatoday.com/newsletters/daily-briefing/

The alarming split in the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship ruling

The ruling was a revealing moment for the future of the court

Trump demands Supreme Court do something it’s done once — ever — in blistering tirade

President Donald Trump demanded that the Supreme Court reverse its own birthright citizenship ruling, something the justices have done exactly once in their 236-year history. In Trump v. Barbara, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of automatic citizenship for virtually every child born on U.S. soil. A rehearing would require the []

John Roberts’ Court Will Be Known for Leading America Backward

There is one loud lesson to be found in this term’s rulings.

{"a":{"_":"Advocates beware: Plyler v. Doe is vulnerable because it’s bad law","href":"/national/commentary/advocates-beware-plyler-v-doe-vulnerable-because-its-bad-law","hreflang":"en"}}

When the Supreme Court bases a decision on policy considerations, the downstream consequences can be significant. A compelling example is 1982’s Plyler v. Doe, when the court struck down a 1975 Texas law allowing public school districts to exclude children of foreign-born parents who were not “legally admitted” to the United States. The court’s concerns were obvious. Denying access to education would harm these children, who often had no choice in the decision to come to America, which could in Read More

Megyn Kelly Melts Down at Trump Justices for Killing His Birthright Plot

Evelyn Hockstein / REUTERSMegyn Kelly went into a tailspin after conservative Supreme Court justices broke ranks to strike down his bid to end birthright citizenship.The conservative pundit, 55, fumed at the conservatives who joined liberal justices in a 6-3 vote rejecting Trump’s efforts to limit birthright citizenship, ruling that he lacked the authority to override the longstanding principle that nearly all babies born on U.S. soil are Americans.Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, which was backed by liberal justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, as well as Trump appointees Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh. Ultra-conservative justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Samuel Alito dissented, signaling they would have overturned a century and a half of citizenship rights.Read more at The Daily Beast.

Major setback for Trump as US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship

A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and []

Justice Thomas Weighs In On Birthright Citizenship Ruling

Justice Clarence Thomas sharply criticized the Supreme Court majority for reading the Constitution to guarantee automatic citizenship to anyone born in the United States, no matter the immigration status of that child’s parents. In a lengthy dissent, Thomas argued that the ruling weakens the meaning of American citizenship and stretches the Fourteenth Amendment beyond what [] The post Justice Thomas Weighs In On Birthright Citizenship Ruling appeared first on Red Right Patriot.

'Feelings of horror:' High Court slams law tying judge appointments to ideology

The government said the law is meant to increase ideological diversity among judges. Supreme Court President Isaac Amit warned that if it remains in force, 'in 15 years we'll have politicized judges and, regrettably, our judicial DNA is liable to change'

U.S. Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump order

The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment and federal law in ruling that anyone born in the U.S., with very limited exceptions, is a citizen.

Judge again upholds Ohio’s anti-DEI law

Affirms professor does not have right to DEI programming.

‘Grotesque Results’ Of Birth Tourism Allow Foreign Invaders To Seize Control Of U.S. From The Inside

'The Court has repurposed the Fourteenth Amendment to protect its own set of preferred rights,' Justice Thomas wrote.