Today in News History
On July 12, several notable moments in the history of News stand out. In 1863, Albert Calmette, French physician, bacteriologist, and immunologist (died 1933) was born. In 1892, Alexander Cartwright, American firefighter, invented baseball (born 1820) passed away. In 1917, The Bisbee Deportation occurs as vigilantes kidnap and deport nearly 1,300 striking miners and others from Bisbee, Arizona. In 1939, Phillip Adams, Australian journalist and producer was born. In 1943, Paul Silas, American basketball player and coach (died 2022) was born. In 1949, Douglas Hyde, Irish scholar and politician, 1st President of Ireland (born 1860) passed away. In 1962, Julio César Chávez, Mexican boxer was born. In 1980, John Warren Davis, American educator, college administrator, and civil rights leader (born 1888) passed away. In 2014, Kenneth J. Gray, American soldier and politician (born 1924) passed away. In 2014, Alfred de Grazia, American political scientist and author (born 1919) passed away. Together, these milestones provide historical context for today's news news and ongoing narratives.
On birthright citizenship, the Supreme Court 'originalists' split on history and Trump
Narrative Analysis: Appeal to Fear
The conservative justices see 'originalism' as a guiding principle to prevent judges from changing the Constitution to adjust to changing times. But that flipped this year.
Narrative Intelligence Brief
This article was published by Los Angeles Times, a source frequently categorized with a lean left bias based in United States of America. Our narrative intelligence engine continuously monitors coverage from this outlet to track framing, bias, and rhetorical patterns. In this specific piece, our systems detected the potential use of the "Appeal to Fear" technique. This narrative approach is often used to shape reader perception by highlighting specific emotional or rhetorical angles. By understanding the editorial perspective of Los Angeles Times, readers can better contextualize the information presented and compare it across our broader media matrix to find the real narrative.
More from Los Angeles Times
July 12, 2026
Barabak: What's in a name? A confounding U.S. Senate race
July 11, 2026
Trump slashes wildlife protections, putting endangered California animals at risk
July 11, 2026
Assassinations unleashed under Trump haunt Iran war endgame
July 11, 2026
Searching for acceptance: How the World Cup drove Mexican Americans back to their roots
July 10, 2026
Trump ousts bipartisan commission in latest effort to reshape elections before midterm
Reliability Insights
P
Technique: Appeal to Fear
System analysis detected use of specific narrative techniques in this piece.Analysis Methodology
This narrative analysis was generated using the CoDataLab Global Intelligence Engine. Our proprietary AI scans thousands of cross-border sources to identify sentiment patterns, framing techniques, and potential media bias. While AI provides the data-driven foundation, our objective is to empower readers with additional context beyond the standard headline.The content displayed above is a structured summary designed for rapid information processing. For the full original report, please visit the source outlet.More Coverage
Discussion
"lindsey graham"
Shock Details of Lindsey Graham’s Emergency Revealed
Celebrity Deaths of 2026: Lindsey Graham and More Stars We’ve Lost This Year
"No Conspiracy": Former Israeli Consul Dismisses Conspiracy Theories about Lindsey Graham's Death
How other outlets are covering this story
Compare narratives across 6 related reports from 6 sources. Real Narrative News aggregates the coverage spectrum so you can see who emphasises what — bias tags reflect the outlet, not the story.
Coverage bias distribution
6 sources
Left 33%
Center 50%
Right 17%
The Tribune
· Jun 30, 2026
Major setback for Trump as US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship
A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and []
The Hill
· Jun 30, 2026
Supreme Court birthright citizenship ruling 'a tremendous betrayal' says Heritage chief
Kevin Roberts, the president of the conservative Heritage Foundation, called the Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday upholding birthright citizenship a “tremendous betrayal of the public.” The Justices in the majority have inflamed the all-out assault on our sovereignty and cheapened the sacred value of American citizenship, Roberts wrote on social platform X. Universal birthright citizenship...
AllSides
· Jul 1, 2026
Birthright Citizenship vs. 'We the People'
The Supreme Court has finally weighed in on birthright citizenship, and to the frustration of conservatives across the nation, they got it wrong. Simply saying that today is enough to invite endless ridicule from those who insist the Constitution plainly and unambiguously grants citizenship to anyone born on American soil. There is little interest in engaging with the intended purpose of the 14th Amendment, its historical context, or whether that interpretation serves the long-term interests of the nation. Yet the same people who demand a strictly literal reading of the 14th Amendment rarely apply that standard consistently to the rest of the Constitution.
Salon
· Jul 2, 2026
The alarming split in the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship ruling
The ruling was a revealing moment for the future of the court
Independent Journal Review
· Jul 2, 2026
Justice Thomas Weighs In On Birthright Citizenship Ruling
Justice Clarence Thomas sharply criticized the Supreme Court majority for reading the Constitution to guarantee automatic citizenship to anyone born in the United States, no matter the immigration status of that child’s parents. In a lengthy dissent, Thomas argued that the ruling weakens the meaning of American citizenship and stretches the Fourteenth Amendment beyond what [] The post Justice Thomas Weighs In On Birthright Citizenship Ruling appeared first on Red Right Patriot.
Bloomberg
· Jun 30, 2026
Domicile Isn't a Real Argument For Citizenship Says Wydra
A divided US Supreme Court upheld the constitutional right of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s planned restrictions and invalidating a central plank of his immigration agenda. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. National citizenship was not an independent concept but simply derivative of state citizenship. “Every citizen of a state,” it was often said, was “ipso facto a citizen of the United States.” In these contexts, too, national citizenship required domicile because state citizenship required domicile. Justice Thomas wrote. Elizabeth Wydra, President of the Constitutional Accountability Center joined Balance of Power to discuss. (Source: Bloomberg)
Topics:
Related coverage for "On birthright citizenship, the Supreme Court 'originalists' split on history and Trump": The Tribune — Major setback for Trump as US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship. The Hill — Supreme Court birthright citizenship ruling 'a tremendous betrayal' says Heritage chief. AllSides — Birthright Citizenship vs. 'We the People'. Salon — The alarming split in the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship ruling. Independent Journal Review — Justice Thomas Weighs In On Birthright Citizenship Ruling. Bloomberg — Domicile Isn't a Real Argument For Citizenship Says Wydra