Newsbusters - Latest News Tracking & Analysis


Latest News Politics , Business , Finance , Technology , World News & Opinion & Tracking & Analysis.

United States of America
Website
🇺🇸 english
Unknown
Newsbusters

Newsbusters

Primary focus: Unknown


Recent Reportage

Latest coverage from Newsbusters

Lydic And Rapinoe Claim America Cares More About Soccer Than Women

Lydic And Rapinoe Claim America Cares More About Soccer Than Women The Daily Show’s host-of-the-week Desi Lydic welcomed former U.S. Women’s National Team soccer player-turned progressive culture warrior Megan Rapinoe to Tuesday’s edition of The Daily Show to help her promote her new podcast, Why Are You Like This? During their conversation Lydic and Rapinoe would smear the country as a bunch of sexists, while Rapinoe would claim that New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is her dream guest.Lydic began by wondering, “So, we, the U.S. just hosted the World Cup. What do you think is harder? Getting Americans to care about soccer or getting Americans to care about women?” The Daily Show's Desi Lydic asks Megan Rapinoe, So, the U.S. Just hosted the World Cup. What do you think is harder? Getting Americans to care about soccer or getting Americans to care about women?Rapinoe answered We seem super into the World Cup. We nailed that and pic.twitter.com/g2RbblQgkK— Alex Christy (@alexchristy17) July 22, 2026 For Rapinoe, the answer was the former, “We seem super into the World Cup. We nailed that.” That led Lydic to wonder, “When’s the rest going to follow?”Rapinoe claimed that Americans will care about soccer outside of the context of the World Cup before they care about women, “Yeah, probably soccer.”As the two bantered back and forth, Lydic responded, “Yeah. Yeah. Okay, so far. So far” and Rapinoe added, “It feels like that's changing, but, you know, slowly?”Later, Lydic turned to the podcast and asked, “Who’s your dream guest?”Rapinoe tried to court Mamdani, “Well, I have been on a—look at the camera: Zohran Mamdani, hey girl! I’m here. I’m in New York. You’re doing a great job. We've got the soccer connection. I would love to do it. I feel like he is doing stuff very differently.” Rapinoe was on to promote her new podcast, because everyone has a podcast, so Lydic asked her Who’s your dream guest? Rapinoe began with Zohran Mamdani, hey girl! I’m here, I’m in New York. You’re doing a great job. She also mentioned Michelle Obama pic.twitter.com/8Y4iFfKLUi— Alex Christy (@alexchristy17) July 22, 2026 After citing basketball players Jalen Brunson and A’ja Wilson, Rapinoe added, “Michelle Obama would be great.”Lydic wrapped things up by thanking Rapinoe, “I appreciate all that you do, all of your advocacy, and I've got to tell you, I like that you're like this. So, thank you for being like this!”It is ironic, but not necessarily surprising, that Lydic and Rapinoe joke about the country caring more about soccer than women. Soccer is what made Rapinoe famous, but now she spends her time advocating for the erosion of competitive integrity in women’s sports by endorsing letting men who think they are women compete in them, and it is that advocacy that makes her a wanted guest for The Daily Show.Here is a transcript for the July 21 show:Comedy Central The Daily Show7/21/202611:25 PM ETDESI LYDIC: So, we, the U.S. Just hosted the World Cup. What do you think is harder? Getting Americans to care about soccer or getting Americans to care about women?MEGAN RAPINOE: We seem super into the World Cup.LYDIC: Yeah. Yeah.RAPINOE: We nailed that.LYDIC: When’s the rest going to follow?RAPINOE: Yeah, hello! Yeah, probably soccer.LYDIC: Yeah. Yeah. Okay, so far. So far.RAPINOE: It feels like that's changing, but, you know, slowly?LYDIC: I sure hope so?RAPINOE: Yeah, it is.LYDIC: Who’s your dream guest?RAPINOE: Well, I have been on a—look at the camera: Zohran Mamdani, hey girl! I’m here, I’m in New York. You’re doing a great job.LYDIC: Make it happen!RAPINOE: We've got the soccer connection. I would love to do it. I feel like he is doing stuff very differently.LYDIC: Yes.RAPINOE: Jalen Brunson over here in New York, that would be interesting.LYDIC: Yeah. Get a Knick in there.RAPINOE: A'ja Wilson would be awesome. Michelle Obama would be great.LYDIC: Yeah. Excellent List.RAPINOE: You can come on the pod any time you want.LYDIC: Well, okay, now you mention me, sure! Sure!RAPINOE: Save the best for last.LYDIC: After Michelle Obama, okay! I appreciate all that you do, all of your advocacy and I've got to tell you, I like that you're like this. So, thank you for being like this!RAPINOE: Thank you. Thank you. Alex Christy Wed, 07/22/2026 - 09:37 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title Lydic And Rapinoe Claim America Cares More About Soccer Than Women CNS Commentary Off Media Images Image Screenshot via Comedy Central/SnapStream

4 hours ago

Tim Walz's Pedophile Pardon Gets Skipped On TV

Tim Walz's Pedophile Pardon Gets Skipped On TV Sexual abuse of minors is a serious crime. But when it comes to the national media, the crime is only serious if it can make Republicans look bad. Recently, Curtis Houck of the Media Research Center found that ABC, CBS, and NBC devoted 1,627 minutes of airtime on their morning, evening, and Sunday shows over the last year to the Jeffrey Epstein controversy, which was overwhelmingly concentrated on Donald Trump.On July 2, The New York Times reported on the front page that Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and two other officials pardoned Tou Lue Vang -- a man convicted of repeatedly sexually abusing a 10-year-old girl -- so he could avoid deportation by the Trump administration. Vang’s original order of removal came in 2006.Where were ABC, CBS, and NBC on this scandal? We couldn’t find any broadcast coverage. PBS and NPR didn’t show up on this story, either. Walz was almost vice president, and they still couldn’t find it.They skipped it again on July 10, when ICE deported Vang, about twenty years too late. Laos was not accepting the return of Laotians back in the George W. Bush era, but they are now.Walz only came up on MS NOW in recounting the ICE shootings in Minnesota earlier in the year. On CNN, we could only find one mention of Walz’s pardon, on Abby Phillip’s NewsNight show, when former Trump press aide Caroline Sunshine briefly brought it up on July 10, but Phillip smothered it down, asking what that had to do with the man shot in Houston by ICE, who had no criminal record.Three nights later, Phillip was more interested in discussing “far right” people who were supposed to seek a pardon for the rapper named “Boosie Badazz.”The local media were pro-Walz. On July 17, the Minnesota Star Tribune, the biggest newspaper in the Gopher State, featured a “Cheers Jeers” column by opinion writer Rochelle Olson. She offered “Cheers” to Walz for pardoning the pedophile! Vang’s actions 20 years ago were awful, but so were the violent protests at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and those folks received presidential pardons,” Olson wrote.Please recall that hundreds of people pardoned in the January 6 prosecutions were convicted of “parading,” or the crime of being present in the Capitol for a few minutes and taking photographs for their Facebook page. To compare those offenders to pedophiles is ludicrous. Even people convicted of assaulting cops don’t compare with repeatedly raping a ten-year-old girl. This demonstrates how much knee-jerk liberals transform criminal migrants into automatic heroes or victims in their anti-Trump narrative.Not every Democrat in Minnesota agreed with the Walz folks. The New York Times reported the attorney’s office in Ramsey County (that includes St. Paul), which handled Vang’s prosecution long ago, opposed this pardon. Tami McConkey, an official there, wrote that Vang had received a lenient sentence of 30 years’ probation in part because the victim in the case, who was then 12, “was experiencing pressure from her family to not cooperate.” Vang’s victim supported the Walz pardon, saying she forgave Vang for his crimes. These networks display a dramatic double standard on pedophilia. It all depends on which party is facing a pedophile scandal. They dramatically overplayed the Epstein conspiracies, but Tim Walz was handed a security blanket of omission. Walz can side with a convicted pedophile over the Evil President and what he called Trump’s “personal Gestapo,” and they’ll stick to covering big summer stories like a bear stealing golf clubs. Tim Graham Wed, 07/22/2026 - 05:56 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title Tim Walz Pedophile Pardon Ignored by National Media Outlets CNS Commentary Off Media Images Image Screencap from Snapstream/Newsmax

7 hours ago

Tim Walz's Pedophile Pardon Gets Skipped on TV

Tim Walz's Pedophile Pardon Gets Skipped on TV Sexual abuse of minors is a serious crime. But when it comes to the national media, the crime is only serious if it can make Republicans look bad. Recently, Curtis Houck of the Media Research Center found that ABC, CBS, and NBC devoted 1,627 minutes of airtime on their morning, evening, and Sunday shows over the last year to the Jeffrey Epstein controversy, which was overwhelmingly concentrated on Donald Trump.On July 2, The New York Times reported on the front page that Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and two other officials pardoned Tou Lue Vang -- a man convicted of repeatedly sexually abusing a 10-year-old girl -- so he could avoid deportation by the Trump administration. Vang’s original order of removal came in 2006.Where were ABC, CBS, and NBC on this scandal? We couldn’t find any broadcast coverage. PBS and NPR didn’t show up on this story, either. Walz was almost vice president, and they still couldn’t find it.They skipped it again on July 10, when ICE deported Vang, about twenty years too late. Laos was not accepting the return of Laotians back in the George W. Bush era, but they are now.Walz only came up on MS NOW in recounting the ICE shootings in Minnesota earlier in the year. On CNN, we could only find one mention of Walz’s pardon, on Abby Phillip’s NewsNight show, when former Trump press aide Caroline Sunshine briefly brought it up on July 10, but Phillip smothered it down, asking what that had to do with the man shot in Houston by ICE, who had no criminal record.Three nights later, Phillip was more interested in discussing “far right” people who were supposed to seek a pardon for the rapper named “Boosie Badazz.”The local media were pro-Walz. On July 17, the Minnesota Star Tribune, the biggest newspaper in the Gopher State, featured a “Cheers Jeers” column by opinion writer Rochelle Olson. She offered “Cheers” to Walz for pardoning the pedophile! Vang’s actions 20 years ago were awful, but so were the violent protests at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and those folks received presidential pardons,” Olson wrote.Please recall that hundreds of people pardoned in the January 6 prosecutions were convicted of “parading,” or the crime of being present in the Capitol for a few minutes and taking photographs for their Facebook page. To compare those offenders to pedophiles is ludicrous. Even people convicted of assaulting cops don’t compare with repeatedly raping a ten-year-old girl. This demonstrates how much knee-jerk liberals transform criminal migrants into automatic heroes or victims in their anti-Trump narrative.Not every Democrat in Minnesota agreed with the Walz folks. The New York Times reported the attorney’s office in Ramsey County (that includes St. Paul), which handled Vang’s prosecution long ago, opposed this pardon. Tami McConkey, an official there, wrote that Vang had received a lenient sentence of 30 years’ probation in part because the victim in the case, who was then 12, “was experiencing pressure from her family to not cooperate.” Vang’s victim supported the Walz pardon, saying she forgave Vang for his crimes. These networks display a dramatic double standard on pedophilia. It all depends on which party is facing a pedophile scandal. They dramatically overplayed the Epstein conspiracies, but Tim Walz was handed a security blanket of omission. Walz can side with a convicted pedophile over the Evil President and what he called Trump’s “personal Gestapo,” and they’ll stick to covering big summer stories like a bear stealing golf clubs. Tim Graham Wed, 07/22/2026 - 05:56 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title Tim Walz Pedophile Pardon Ignored by National Media Outlets CNS Commentary Off Media Images Image Screencap from Snapstream/Newsmax

7 hours ago

Publishing Activity

Daily article output trend

ABC Mitigates NJ Illegal Alien Voters Report with Trump Speech Rehash

ABC Mitigates NJ Illegal Alien Voters Report with Trump Speech Rehash That thing that everyone insists never happens has happened again, in New Jersey and with documented evidence exposed by the governor herself. The major networks covered it on the Elitist Media evening news, with one of the newscasts mitigating a damaging counternarrative story with “But Trump” filler.Watch as ABC World News Tonight counterprogrammed news of the discovery with whataboutism on President Trump. Watch the full report as aired on Tuesday, July 21st, 2026: WATCH: ABC mitigates 58 seconds on New Jersey's discovery of 6000+ illegal aliens on the voter rolls with 48 seconds of But Trump. A story so damning it needs seasoning in order to air.DAVID MUIR: Now to the election error revealed here in the Northeast, New Jersey's pic.twitter.com/g715ZCtHhT— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) July 22, 2026 DAVID MUIR: Now to the election error revealed here in the Northeast, New Jersey's governor tonight revealing more than 6000 noncitizens were mistakenly added to the voter rolls in that state. So how did this happen and how many actually voted? Here's Mary Bruce tonight.MARY BRUCE: Tonight, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill revealing that because of a computer error, about 6600 noncitizens applying for a driver's license were also improperly registered to vote.MIKIE SHERRILL: In the case of this error, some individuals indicated that they weren't citizens and weren't eligible to vote, but the software registered them anyway.BRUCE: The governor says about 400 of those noncitizens actually voted, but that there's no evidence their votes swayed any elections. She says officials became aware of the issue last week, and that all 6600 people are being scrubbed from the voter rolls.SHERRILL: We don't deflect, deny or exploit problems for our own gain. We find them and we fix them.BRUCE: The White House says the episode, quote, “underscores the absolute necessity of the SAVE America Act, President Trump's bill requiring voter ID and proof of citizenship. The President has been amping up his unproven claims of widespread election fraud, pointing a finger at China.DONALD TRUMP: of China's sinister election meddling.BRUCE: Just three months ago, Trump heaped praise on China's longtime leader Xi Jinping.TRUMP: You're a great leader. I say it to everybody. You're a great leader. Sometimes people don't like me saying it, but I say it anyway because it's true.BRUCE: Today, asked if China will now face consequences for their alleged election meddling. Trump brushing it off.TRUMP: Well, we're going to talk to them about it. It took place a long time ago. I think China is maybe a little bit different today than it was then.BRUCE: And David, back to New Jersey, the governor there says they are now scrubbing their voter rolls. And she vows this will never happen again, saying when they find problems, they fix them. David.MUIR: Mary Bruce live at The White House tonight. Mary, thanks.It is interesting that ABC keeps wanting to relitigate the President Trump speech on election security that they refused to air. Chief White House Correspondent Mary Bruce, at her Mary Bruciest, conjures up a mishmash of the election security speech, President Trump’s trip to China, and the SAVE America Act in order to deflect from the fact that a blue state (albeit in error, as we are told) registered ineligible noncitizens to vote. The story is too damaging to the prevailing narrative and therefore can’t just be allowed to run alone on ABC. Hence Bruce, the most overtly partisan of the White House chiefs, ran mitigation. Bruce, true to form, concludes her report by parroting Gov. Sherrill’s line on finding and fixing problems almost verbatim. And that really sums up Bruce’s reporting. Sherrill gets fluff, Trump gets “unproven claims” and “Xi-lover.”CBS, on the other hand, ran the cleanest story of all. Here is Weijia Jiang’s brief at the end of her Iran roundup, as aired on the CBS Evening News on Tuesday, July 21st, 2026: WATCH: In contrast to ABC, CBS offered a clean brief on NJ's discovery of 6600+ noncitizen voters TONY DOKOUPIL: Weijia, in other news, New Jersey's Democratic governor today announced that some noncitizens were indeed able to vote in recent elections. What can you tell us pic.twitter.com/50BUPj2tm2— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) July 22, 2026 TONY DOKOUPIL: Weijia, in other news, New Jersey's Democratic governor today announced that some noncitizens were indeed able to vote in recent elections. What can you tell us about that?WEIJIA JIANG: Tony, that's right. Governor Mikie Sherrill revealed about 6600 noncitizens were accidentally added to New Jersey's voter rolls. And about 400 of them cast improper ballots in recent elections. Sherrill said it was a serious software error in the state's motor vehicle system that led to the mistake. When these people were applying for driver's license, they answered no when asked if they were U.S. citizens but they were registered to vote, anyway. Sherrill says she is taking action to prevent anything like that from happening again. Tony.DOKOUPIL: Weijia, thank you.There is none of the fluff or mitigation included in the ABC report. Jiang performs a straightforward recitation of the story and allows viewers to assess the presented facts for themselves. A rare occurrence on the Elitist Media evening news.The same can almost be said for NBC Nightly News: WATCH: NBC' s brief on NJ discovery of 6000+ noncitizens on the voter rolls. No But Trump mitigation like ABC, non-specific description of the SAVE America Act without describing it by name.TOM LLAMAS: And tonight we are learning hundreds of noncitizens in New Jersey were pic.twitter.com/jVnRML5G1M— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) July 22, 2026 TOM LLAMAS: And tonight we are learning hundreds of noncitizens in New Jersey were able to cast ballots because of a software glitch. Ryan Nobles joins us now live. And Ryan, the governor came out today and revealed this herself.RYAN NOBLES: Yeah, that's right, Tom. New Jersey's Governor Mikie Sherrill said that a DMV software error led to more than 6,000 noncitizens being registered to vote when they signed up for driver's licenses or identification cards. 400 of those noncitizens actually cast ballots in New Jersey elections between 2023 and 2024, though it’s unclear which elections. The governor said they were registered as Democrats, Republicans and unaffiliated voters and there's no evidence that any elections were swayed as a result. The state is now in the process of removing all of those names from the voter rolls. The number of noncitizens accidentally registered to vote were a tiny percentage of the overall New Jersey electorate. Now, President Trump, of course, putting pressure on Congress to pass new laws that would require all voters to demonstrate proof of citizenship before being eligible to vote. Tom.LLAMAS: Ryan Nobles for us.The difference between this report and CBS’s is that Congressional Correspondent Ryan Nobles did a bit of mitigation by stating that “there’s no evidence any elections were swayed as a result” of the 400 ineligible noncitizen voters. There isn’t any evidence that they didn’t sway an election, either. Nobles doesn’t say that. Nobles also goes on to mention the SAVE America Act in a weird, non-specific way, without actually saying its name.The good news in all this is that the Elitist Media evening news DIDN’T suppress a counternarrative story that bolsters President Trump’s arguments in favor of election security laws. On the other, the most Trump-deranged network reported the story in the most Trump-deranged way. Jorge Bonilla Wed, 07/22/2026 - 00:02 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title ABC Mitigates NJ Illegal Alien Voters Report with Trump Speech Rehash CNS Commentary Off Media Images Image Screenshot via ABC/Snapstream

13 hours ago

Cringe: Atlantic Magazine Compares Democratic Socialists to MAGA

Cringe: Atlantic Magazine Compares Democratic Socialists to MAGA Image YouTube Screenshot Kirchick's obvious attempt to placate liberals with the absurd DSA/MAGA comparison appeared in The DSA Is Only Using the Democratic Party. The subtitle made clear the low opinion Kirchick held of the DSA, The left-wing faction is a parasite.Following a long-winded treatise on how Neil Kinnock, whom Joe Biden notoriously plagiarized, saved the British Labour Party by severely denouncing a far-left group that attempted to take it over, Kirchick finally gets around to his own slapdown of the DSA for similarly trying to take over the Democrat Party:...The DSA’s agenda is alien to mainstream Democrats—or at least it should be. The organization’s draft platform calls for “fully abolishing the police and prison system,” drafting a “new constitution,” extending voting rights to noncitizens, and creating a “democratic socialist republic.” The group holds the U.S. and NATO responsible for Russia’s war against Ukraine, defends the Communist dictatorship in Cuba, and pledges to shut down the Department of Defense and all overseas American military bases.To gain leverage within the Democratic Party, the DSA is employing a tactic that Trotsky dubbed “entryism”—the willful effort by a small, disciplined cadre of radicals to infiltrate a more moderate organization and subvert it from within. It’s the same tactic that, throughout history, far-left organizations such as the Militant Tendency have routinely used to amass power. Unless the Democrats respond forcefully to the DSA’s entryism, they risk being overrun by extremists who will poison the party’s national brand and sap its capacity to compete with an already radicalized GOP.And here we see the first glimmering of Kirchick's shtick, namely the pretense that the GOP has somehow gotten as radicalized to the far right as what is happening to the Democrats being pushed to the loony left by the DSA.After several more paragraphs of DSA slamming for trying to take over his beloved Democrats, Kirchick goes to the theme of MAGA as DSA.One of the less remarked upon adverse effects of the Trump presidency is the way in which it has radicalized the left, giving license to bad actors and bad ideas. Fearful of appearing weak in the eyes of their base, most elected Democrats have adopted a “no enemies on the left” approach to dealing with the DSA and other radical forces. If such pusillanimity continues, Democrats risk losing their party to a band of true believers no less destructive than the furthest extremes of the MAGA movement....Democrats can look across the aisle to see what a vigorous contest for the soul of a major political party looks like. Given how slavishly the GOP has fallen into line behind Trump, it’s hard to remember the ferocity of the ideological battles that took place within the conservative movement while he was attempting a hostile takeover of that party in 2015 and 2016. The conservative-activist-and-intellectual space was galvanized by debates over Trump and what he represented, and a whopping 16 other candidates competed against Trump for the party’s nomination.Notice what was missing from Kirchick's critique of a GOP influenced by MAGA: Any specifics even remotely approaching his charges against the leftists attempting a Democrat Party takeover with such policies as abolishing the police and the prison system along with ditching the U.S. Constitution. Basically, Kirchick wants us to believe that the GOP and MAGA is just as destructive as the DSA without providing the least bit of evidence as to why this is so. P.J. Gladnick Tue, 07/21/2026 - 22:32 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title Atlantic Magazine Compares Democratic Socialists to MAGA Movement CNS Commentary Off Media Images Image YouTube Screenshot

15 hours ago

MS NOW: ‘Socialist Republicans’ Are ‘Seizing the Means of Production’

MS NOW: ‘Socialist Republicans’ Are ‘Seizing the Means of Production’ Snapstream Recently, the Democratic Party has found itself divided between the establishment wing of the party and a new, much more radical gang of socialists calling for revolutionary changes to party policy. After welcoming the socialist faction into the Democratic Party with open arms the previous day, on Tuesday’s Morning Joe, MS NOW’s Joe Scarborough did a complete 180, attacking “socialist Republicans” for being the real communists in a bizarre and hypocritical rant.Irate that Republicans were calling out the Democrats were embracing the socialist faction that openly embraces Communist figures like Mao Zedong and Karl Marx, Scarborough shouted about how Republicans were somehow the real socialists:This president is seizing control of private companies. That is socialism! That is communism! And our debt, our debt is so massive, Social Security is running out of money. Our debt is so massive that we are now spending- you talk about socialists, these socialist Republicans in Washington DC, now have us for the first time spending more money paying the interest on their debt than we spend on defending our country with money to the armed services. Yesterday, Scarborough was supporting socialists in the Democratic party. Today he's suddenly blaming the socialist Republicans for the US debt crisis. Last I checked, the Dems (actually socialist!) are the ones going gung-ho for big spending. The cognitive dissonance is clear. pic.twitter.com/KlU8sltbV4— James Waterman (@jwatermaniv) July 21, 2026 In his ridiculous attack against President Trump’s “socialist” policies, Scarborough appears to have forgotten his freakout about Trump’s cuts to government spending. In fact, everything he accuses Trump of is really just a projection of his own positions. Scarborough himself was terrified by Republican spending cuts back during the Biden administration, yet now he claims to care about the U.S. debt?Scarborough also pretends to care about the armed forces, emphasizing that U.S. debt interest spending has exceeded defense spending. This coming from the guy who has repeatedly endorsed cuts to the military budget and defended radical DEI policies in the military. The only kind of military spending he seems to want is the kind that funds sex-change surgeries for soldiers!Oblivious to his hypocrisy, Scarborough continues his attacks on the “socialist” Republicans, digging deeper into them “seizing control of private companies”:I mean, it's- these people are not spending money like drunken sailors. They're spending money like drunken socialists, and they have the nerve, after seizing tech companies - they have the nerve, after spending us into massive debt, to point fingers at anybody else and say, “Oh look at them! They're the socialists! They're the communists!” No they're not. They need to just look in the mirror if they want to see who the real socialists are.When Scarborough referenced the administration “seizing tech companies,” he was likely referring to the government’s move to buy minority stakes in a number of U.S. tech giants. Is investing in the stock market is socialist now?On the other hand, he has also argued for the government to break up major tech companies by force, a move that’s much more in line with socialist policy. So which is it, Scarborough? If Trump’s a socialist, are you one too?The transcript is below. Click expand to read.MS NOW’s Morning JoeJuly 21, 202607:18:06 a.m. Eastern(...)JOE SCARBOROUGH: And I would just say if I were in that position, you know, you've got the Speaker of the House and Donald Trump talking about communists, talking about socialists.Jon Lemire, I've never seen in my time a president spending more money, blowing more money, centralizing power, seizing the means of production from some of our most powerful tech companies, than this president. This president is seizing control of private companies! That is socialism! That is communism!And our debt, our debt is so massive, Social Security is running out of money. Our debt is so massive that we are now spending- you talk about socialists, these socialist Republicans in Washington DC, now have us for the first time spending more money paying the interest on their debt than we spend on defending our country with money to the armed services.I mean, it's- these people are not spending money like drunken sailors. They're spending money like drunken socialists, and they have the nerve, after seizing tech companies - they have the nerve, after spending us into massive debt, to point fingers at anybody else and say, “Oh look at them! They're the socialists! They're the communists!” No they're not. They need to just look in the mirror if they want to see who the real socialists are.JONATHAN LEMIRE: The call is coming from inside the house, comrade Trump.SCARBOROUGH: Yes.LEMIRE: This is the attack line they've settled on as we head into the midterms. And at least so far, polls suggest it's just not working.() James Waterman Tue, 07/21/2026 - 22:22 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title Joe Scarborough Calls Out 'Socialist Republicans' on Morning Joe CNS Commentary Off Media Images Image Snapstream

15 hours ago

David Bozell Discusses Digital Bias on Next Up with Mark Halperin

David Bozell Discusses Digital Bias on Next Up with Mark Halperin A completely synchronized news landscape is hard to picture today. Yet in the late 1990s, as media outlets uniformly shifted to the left, a massive audience was left hungry for conservative perspectives, paving the way for outlets like Fox News. Today, that struggle over balanced representation continues in the digital sphere. Tuesday afternoon on the podcast Next Up with Mark Halperin, Media Research Center (MRC) President David Bozell sat down with Mark Halperin to discuss why both left- and right-leaning platforms should be equally accessible to everyone. The Big Four news apps (Apple, Google, Yahoo, and MSN) favor liberal sources and largely ignore conservative sources, and the MRC is actively working to combat that issue. The Minnesota Star Tribune made it to the top 50 websites in January, all because Apple News linked to them 11 times and Google News linked to them 6 times. @DavidBozell exposes the power of Apple and Google News with @MarkHalperin on @NextUpHalperin pic.twitter.com/8Zlddn4Vxv— Media Research Center (@theMRC) July 21, 2026Every month, Press Gazette publishes a breakdown of the top news websites in America. The New York Times consistently leads, followed by CNN, with The Wall Street Journal ranking in the top 15. MRC research shows how public views and opinions are shaped directly by the news sources they read. A Reuters poll revealed that 58 of the country gets their news directly from either Apple News, Google News, Yahoo, or MSN as points of entry—all of which disproportionately push left-wing news outlets. Bozell stated:“The goal is to address where the blockage remains. Right now, conservative outlets are largely blocked at digital points of entry. If we can level the playing field on these news apps, users will get a far more balanced feed.The conservative ecosystem, if given an equal opportunity to thrive, it typically wins. @DavidBozell @MarkHalperin @NextUpHalperin pic.twitter.com/q8HpH36fqM— Media Research Center (@theMRC) July 21, 2026Balanced coverage is a necessity— every American should be able to open up their phone and get the news in its entirety, for all that it is. Watch the full episode here: Alice Reich Tue, 07/21/2026 - 20:10 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title David Bozell Discusses Digital Bias on Next Up with Mark Halperin CNS Commentary Off Media Images Image MRC Graphic

17 hours ago

MS NOW Claims Trump Wants To 'Take Over' Elections To 'Become a King'

MS NOW Claims Trump Wants To 'Take Over' Elections To 'Become a King' MS NOW's The Last Word on SnapStream The left has shown time and time again their willingness to use every weapon they can against their political opponents. These weapons range from smears to lawfare to actual weapons, as we saw in several Trump assassination attempts and the successful assassination of Charlie Kirk last September. They hounded Trump throughout the 2024 election with lawfare, raiding Mar-a-Lago and posting his mugshot everywhere. And they’re still trying to accuse the President of election interference, as pushed by MS NOW’s Jacob Soboroff on Monday as he guest hosted The Last Word.In the midst of the controversy rising around Elon Musk’s payments to Wisconsin voters last year, Soboroff and his guest, author and former Wisconsin state Democratic Party chair Ben Wikler, reverted to their old trick of equating Musk and Trump. According to Wikler, if Musk is under fire for possibly violating election law, then Trump must be trying to take over elections again:So whenever Donald Trump has a freak out about the fact that he is so incredibly, hideously unpopular, he starts trying to come up with ways to take over the election system. He can't, as long as there are Democratic governors, attorneys general, state supreme court justices who stand in his way, they actually have the power over this. The Constitution entrusts elections to the states, but there are federal voting laws and restrictions, which the executive enforces. But for Democrats scared about those enforcements impeding their voter rolls, whenever Trump breathes towards election security, they have to panic and imply that he’ll launch January 6th, 2.0, So this book is a battle plan to make sure that that line of defense is secure before we get to 2028 and his next chance to attempt a national coup.And, is it even an MS NOW segment without accusing Trump of being a kingly authoritarian? No, it’s not:WIKLER: We know that these local county clerks, we know that secretaries of state that do - never get in the national headlines.SOBOROFF: They're threatened with arrest.WIKLER: Yeah, they're threatened with arrest right now because Trump knows that they could actually thwart his ambitions to become a king. Of course, Soboroff and Wikler don’t name any examples of these secretaries of state. They just act like it’s a self-evident, everyday occurrence. Additionally, Trump doesn’t order someone’s arrest just because they “thwart his ambitions to become a king.” That’s more from the Democrats’ playbook, to engage in meaningless lawfare. Trump’s DOJ can and should, however, enforce federal voting laws. And no, attempts to secure our elections from foreign and domestic interference are not fascist.The transcript is below. Click expand to read:MS NOW's The Last Word7/20/2610:48:07 p.m. Eastern JACOB SOBOROFF: Tonight, Elon Musk could be facing criminal charges in Wisconsin, because it turns out that the world's richest Republican cannot just buy his way out of losing an election. In April of 2025, just weeks after Elon Musk was seen on television upstaging Donald Trump in the Oval Office, you might remember that Wisconsin held a state Supreme Court election, the first big election anywhere in the country since Donald Trump was inaugurated for the second time. And what happened? Elon Musk spent more than 20 million backing the conservative candidate in that race. He traveled to Wisconsin. He put on a Green Bay Packers cheesehead hat at a rally of about 2,000 people, and he handed out two 1 million checks to two voters while offering cash incentives to others tied to that election. And now the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission has concluded that Elon Musk likely broke the state's election bribery law. This commission voted 5 to 1 to refer the complaints to the Brown County district attorney, who will now decide whether to pursue criminal charges for Elon Musk's election tactics.Musk had repeatedly argued that the judicial election would shape the future of congressional redistricting in Wisconsin, and that matters, because that could ultimately affect which political party controls the United States House of Representatives next year. But Wisconsin voters rejected Musk's preferred candidate by ten points, and they voted instead for the liberal candidate, former prosecutor Susan Crawford, on that particular election night.Our next guest, Ben Winkler - Wikler, excuse me, who was then Wisconsin's Democratic Party chair, called into this program, you remember, just after the liberal victory was announced and said Wisconsin voters saw exactly what Elon Musk was up to.[Cut to audio]BEN WIKLER [4/1/2025]: They know that he is grabbing money out of their pockets in order to stuff them into his own pockets. He was trying to buy the state the way he bought Brad Schimel, his preferred Supreme Court candidate, and voters found that outrageous. They flatly rejected it. Now we know, and the jig is up.[Cut back to live]SOBOROFF: The jig is up.That election offered Democrats a lesson that extends well beyond Wisconsin. State supreme courts, legislatures, governors too increasingly determine everything from voting rules to congressional maps. Winning those down ballot races can be just as consequential as winning at the federal level. National generic congressional polls right now show Democrats with an advantage in single digit margins, though mostly still within the margin of error. In his new book, This Is the Plan: How to End America's Meltdown and Save Democracy, Ben Wikler argues that the battles shaping American democracy are often decided far from Washington. They're decided in state courts and in state legislatures and local elections where the rules of democracy are written.Ben writes of the Wisconsin state Supreme Court election, quote, This is a book about why elections like Susan Crawford's are so important — maybe not to the entire future of the human race, which will hopefully be pretty long — but to the future of democracy and the possibility of a fair economy in the United States. But this book isn't just an analysis. It's a prescription. The point is not to monitor the situation, but to change it. Joining us now is Ben Wikler, the former Democratic Party chair of Wisconsin. He is author of this book, This Is the Plan: How to End America's Meltdown and Save Democracy, which is out tomorrow. It's so good to see you. It's good to hold this in my hands. It feels pretty meaty.WIKLER: I'm pretty excited it's in your hands, and it's about to be in a lot more people's hands. I wrote this book after six years leading the Democratic state party in Wisconsin. It was a state that, not very long ago, was more rigged, more gerrymandered, more voter suppression, more dominated by a far-right state supreme court than the United States of America is right now. It seemed more hopeless to people in our state, but thousands of people rolled up their sleeves. And we tested and we tried a million different ways to fight and win elections and figured out how to unrig our state step by step. So in this book, I take that blueprint, that battle plan, and I map it out on the national stage for what people can do everywhere in this nation to get us out of this flaming train wreck that Donald Trump and the current GOP has - have driven the United States into.SOBOROFF: It's the exact book we need right now. But this, even more recent news, when you hear that the Elections Commission says that Musk may have very well broke election law in Wisconsin, what goes through your head?WIKLER: The first thing that goes through my head is that Donald Trump's pardon power does not apply to convictions in state courts.SOBOROFF: You better believe it.WIKLER: States are, frankly, where a lot of the action is right now, and there, rightly, is a ton of energy to elect a new majority, a Democratic majority in the House and the U.S. Senate this cycle. But it's states that the U.S. Constitution puts in charge of running elections. So whenever Donald Trump has a freak out about the fact that he is so incredibly, hideously unpopular—SOBOROFF: Yeah.WIKLER: —he starts trying to come up with ways to take over the election system. He can't, as long as there are Democratic governors, attorneys general, state supreme court justices who stand in his way, they actually have the power over this. So this book is a battle plan to make sure that that line of defense is secure before we get to 2028 and his next chance to attempt a national coup.SOBOROFF: It was really amazing to hear you — to play back that clip that I think viewers of this program will definitely remember, and think about what you said on that night that Wisconsin voters rejected the influence of billionaires in your state. Does this new development vindicate that?WIKLER: Absolutely. The opening scene in the book is Elon Musk going in Green Bay and putting that cheesehead on his head and saying, “this race will affect the entire future destiny of all of humanity.” And he thought that he was going to demonstrate that, as the richest man in the world, he had unchallengeable power, that he could buy whatever election he wanted, just as, in the view of Donald Trump at the time and a ton of the country, he had bought the presidential election for his preferred presidential candidate. If he had won, then candidates at all levels of government would have run screaming from the possibility that he might throw a few tens of millions of dollars at them.SOBOROFF: And hold those stupid, giant, fake checks up in order to convince these voters.WIKLER: Absolutely. It was the most disgusting and obscene and frankly, cynical approach to politics that you can imagine. And for a lot of people, it seemed like it might work. You know, later financial disclosures showed that his total investment in that race, including all of his, kind of, attempted election bribes, 56 million—SOBOROFF: Wow.WILKER: — more than anyone's ever spent in a judicial election anyway - anywhere. But we won in Wisconsin. Susan Crawford won that race not just because he pissed everybody off, and not just because she was an amazing candidate. She was, but also because of this neighbor-to-neighbor organizing across the state. The unions, the grassroots groups that decided not just to fight in the big elections where everyone's paying attention, but to fight in every election that might affect the future of democracy in our state. And that's the kind of approach that we need now in this country. We know that these local county clerks, we know that secretaries of state that do - never get in the national headlines.SOBOROFF: They're threatened with arrest.WIKLER: Yeah, they're threatened with arrest right now because Trump knows that they could actually thwart his ambitions to become a king.(...) Siena Do Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:58 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title MS NOW Alleges Trump Seeks Control of Elections to Gain More Power CNS Commentary Off Media Images Image MS NOW's The Last Word on SnapStream

17 hours ago

MS NOW Claims Trump Wants to 'Take Over' Elections to 'Become a King'

MS NOW Claims Trump Wants to 'Take Over' Elections to 'Become a King' MS NOW's The Last Word on SnapStream The left has shown time and time again their willingness to use every weapon they can against their political opponents. These weapons range from smears to lawfare to actual weapons, as we saw in several Trump assassination attempts and the successful assassination of Charlie Kirk last September. They hounded Trump throughout the 2024 election with lawfare, raiding Mar-a-Lago and posting his mugshot everywhere. And they’re still trying to accuse the President of election interference, as pushed by MS NOW’s Jacob Soboroff on Monday as he guest hosted The Last Word.In the midst of the controversy rising around Elon Musk’s payments to Wisconsin voters last year, Soboroff and his guest, author and former Wisconsin state Democratic Party chair Ben Wikler, reverted to their old trick of equating Musk and Trump. According to Wikler, if Musk is under fire for possibly violating election law, then Trump must be trying to take over elections again:So whenever Donald Trump has a freak out about the fact that he is so incredibly, hideously unpopular, he starts trying to come up with ways to take over the election system. He can't, as long as there are Democratic governors, attorneys general, state supreme court justices who stand in his way, they actually have the power over this. The Constitution entrusts elections to the states, but there are federal voting laws and restrictions, which the executive enforces. But for Democrats scared about those enforcements impeding their voter rolls, whenever Trump breathes towards election security, they have to panic and imply that he’ll launch January 6th, 2.0, So this book is a battle plan to make sure that that line of defense is secure before we get to 2028 and his next chance to attempt a national coup.And, is it even an MS NOW segment without accusing Trump of being a kingly authoritarian? No, it’s not:WIKLER: We know that these local county clerks, we know that secretaries of state that do - never get in the national headlines.SOBOROFF: They're threatened with arrest.WIKLER: Yeah, they're threatened with arrest right now because Trump knows that they could actually thwart his ambitions to become a king. Of course, Soboroff and Wikler don’t name any examples of these secretaries of state. They just act like it’s a self-evident, everyday occurrence. Additionally, Trump doesn’t order someone’s arrest just because they “thwart his ambitions to become a king.” That’s more from the Democrats’ playbook, to engage in meaningless lawfare. Trump’s DOJ can and should, however, enforce federal voting laws. And no, attempts to secure our elections from foreign and domestic interference are not fascist.The transcript is below. Click expand to read:MS NOW's The Last Word7/20/2610:48:07 p.m. Eastern JACOB SOBOROFF: Tonight, Elon Musk could be facing criminal charges in Wisconsin, because it turns out that the world's richest Republican cannot just buy his way out of losing an election. In April of 2025, just weeks after Elon Musk was seen on television upstaging Donald Trump in the Oval Office, you might remember that Wisconsin held a state Supreme Court election, the first big election anywhere in the country since Donald Trump was inaugurated for the second time. And what happened? Elon Musk spent more than 20 million backing the conservative candidate in that race. He traveled to Wisconsin. He put on a Green Bay Packers cheesehead hat at a rally of about 2,000 people, and he handed out two 1 million checks to two voters while offering cash incentives to others tied to that election. And now the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission has concluded that Elon Musk likely broke the state's election bribery law. This commission voted 5 to 1 to refer the complaints to the Brown County district attorney, who will now decide whether to pursue criminal charges for Elon Musk's election tactics.Musk had repeatedly argued that the judicial election would shape the future of congressional redistricting in Wisconsin, and that matters, because that could ultimately affect which political party controls the United States House of Representatives next year. But Wisconsin voters rejected Musk's preferred candidate by ten points, and they voted instead for the liberal candidate, former prosecutor Susan Crawford, on that particular election night.Our next guest, Ben Winkler - Wikler, excuse me, who was then Wisconsin's Democratic Party chair, called into this program, you remember, just after the liberal victory was announced and said Wisconsin voters saw exactly what Elon Musk was up to.[Cut to audio]BEN WIKLER [4/1/2025]: They know that he is grabbing money out of their pockets in order to stuff them into his own pockets. He was trying to buy the state the way he bought Brad Schimel, his preferred Supreme Court candidate, and voters found that outrageous. They flatly rejected it. Now we know, and the jig is up.[Cut back to live]SOBOROFF: The jig is up.That election offered Democrats a lesson that extends well beyond Wisconsin. State supreme courts, legislatures, governors too increasingly determine everything from voting rules to congressional maps. Winning those down ballot races can be just as consequential as winning at the federal level. National generic congressional polls right now show Democrats with an advantage in single digit margins, though mostly still within the margin of error. In his new book, This Is the Plan: How to End America's Meltdown and Save Democracy, Ben Wikler argues that the battles shaping American democracy are often decided far from Washington. They're decided in state courts and in state legislatures and local elections where the rules of democracy are written.Ben writes of the Wisconsin state Supreme Court election, quote, This is a book about why elections like Susan Crawford's are so important — maybe not to the entire future of the human race, which will hopefully be pretty long — but to the future of democracy and the possibility of a fair economy in the United States. But this book isn't just an analysis. It's a prescription. The point is not to monitor the situation, but to change it. Joining us now is Ben Wikler, the former Democratic Party chair of Wisconsin. He is author of this book, This Is the Plan: How to End America's Meltdown and Save Democracy, which is out tomorrow. It's so good to see you. It's good to hold this in my hands. It feels pretty meaty.WIKLER: I'm pretty excited it's in your hands, and it's about to be in a lot more people's hands. I wrote this book after six years leading the Democratic state party in Wisconsin. It was a state that, not very long ago, was more rigged, more gerrymandered, more voter suppression, more dominated by a far-right state supreme court than the United States of America is right now. It seemed more hopeless to people in our state, but thousands of people rolled up their sleeves. And we tested and we tried a million different ways to fight and win elections and figured out how to unrig our state step by step. So in this book, I take that blueprint, that battle plan, and I map it out on the national stage for what people can do everywhere in this nation to get us out of this flaming train wreck that Donald Trump and the current GOP has - have driven the United States into.SOBOROFF: It's the exact book we need right now. But this, even more recent news, when you hear that the Elections Commission says that Musk may have very well broke election law in Wisconsin, what goes through your head?WIKLER: The first thing that goes through my head is that Donald Trump's pardon power does not apply to convictions in state courts.SOBOROFF: You better believe it.WIKLER: States are, frankly, where a lot of the action is right now, and there, rightly, is a ton of energy to elect a new majority, a Democratic majority in the House and the U.S. Senate this cycle. But it's states that the U.S. Constitution puts in charge of running elections. So whenever Donald Trump has a freak out about the fact that he is so incredibly, hideously unpopular—SOBOROFF: Yeah.WIKLER: —he starts trying to come up with ways to take over the election system. He can't, as long as there are Democratic governors, attorneys general, state supreme court justices who stand in his way, they actually have the power over this. So this book is a battle plan to make sure that that line of defense is secure before we get to 2028 and his next chance to attempt a national coup.SOBOROFF: It was really amazing to hear you — to play back that clip that I think viewers of this program will definitely remember, and think about what you said on that night that Wisconsin voters rejected the influence of billionaires in your state. Does this new development vindicate that?WIKLER: Absolutely. The opening scene in the book is Elon Musk going in Green Bay and putting that cheesehead on his head and saying, “this race will affect the entire future destiny of all of humanity.” And he thought that he was going to demonstrate that, as the richest man in the world, he had unchallengeable power, that he could buy whatever election he wanted, just as, in the view of Donald Trump at the time and a ton of the country, he had bought the presidential election for his preferred presidential candidate. If he had won, then candidates at all levels of government would have run screaming from the possibility that he might throw a few tens of millions of dollars at them.SOBOROFF: And hold those stupid, giant, fake checks up in order to convince these voters.WIKLER: Absolutely. It was the most disgusting and obscene and frankly, cynical approach to politics that you can imagine. And for a lot of people, it seemed like it might work. You know, later financial disclosures showed that his total investment in that race, including all of his, kind of, attempted election bribes, 56 million—SOBOROFF: Wow.WILKER: — more than anyone's ever spent in a judicial election anyway - anywhere. But we won in Wisconsin. Susan Crawford won that race not just because he pissed everybody off, and not just because she was an amazing candidate. She was, but also because of this neighbor-to-neighbor organizing across the state. The unions, the grassroots groups that decided not just to fight in the big elections where everyone's paying attention, but to fight in every election that might affect the future of democracy in our state. And that's the kind of approach that we need now in this country. We know that these local county clerks, we know that secretaries of state that do - never get in the national headlines.SOBOROFF: They're threatened with arrest.WIKLER: Yeah, they're threatened with arrest right now because Trump knows that they could actually thwart his ambitions to become a king.(...) Siena Do Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:58 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title MS NOW Alleges Trump Seeks Control of Elections to Gain More Power CNS Commentary Off Media Images Image MS NOW's The Last Word on SnapStream

17 hours ago

The View Claims No Election Has Ever Been Stolen Before Trump Speech

The View Claims No Election Has Ever Been Stolen Before Trump Speech ABC via SnapStream Throughout the 29 seasons of The View, the co-hosts have openly claimed the presidential elections of 2000, 2016, and 2024, along with EVERY Republican electoral victory have all been stolen, rigged, or otherwise illegitimate. However, since The View also feels the need to oppose seemingly everything President Trump says in the most maximalist way possible, Joy Behar took time on Tuesday’s episode to insanely suggest that no election in the history of the “planet” was ever stolen or rigged.In reacting to Trump’s Thursday address for the first time, co-host Joy Behar claimed that she could never recall a time in her life that the result of an election was questionable. She even got backup from co-host Sunny Hostin:BEHAR: You know, for the 10,000 years that I've been on this planet, this has never come up before! Have any - Does anyone remember?!HOSTIN: Well, there's no real evidence of election fraud. It's like 0.0003 percent of election fraud. So, it just doesn’t exist. It's a non-issue.BEHAR: Basically.HOSTIN: And you’re right, it's not something that has ever come up before.That might be the most brazen attempt at disinformation The View had ever spewed since they first claimed they were a “bona fide news program” in 2014. Joy Behar claims NO election has been stolen EVER in the history of the planet before Trump: You know, for the 10,000 years that I've been on this planet, this has never come up before! Does anyone remember?! pic.twitter.com/Go4SNjXWFJ— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) July 21, 2026 In 2012, Behar still wouldn’t shut up about the 2000 election even though it was fully legitimate. In an interview with disgraced former New York Governor and prostitute aficionado Eliot Spitzer (D), she griped: “I'm still ticked off about the 2000 election.” Adding, “I'm still ticked off about the 2000 election.”It was rich for Hostin to open her mouth about it too because she spent years insisting that Trump’s victory in 2016 was illegitimate, only to change her mind six years later when her friend Karine Jean-Pierre was getting flack for spewing the same non-sense.Just last month, Hostin argued that it was understandable for people to be suspicious of the results of the 2024 presidential election.Additionally, throughout 2025, The View repeatedly suggested Trump stole the 2024 presidential election, without evidence and without even a theory about how it could have been done.Over the years, Behar has repeatedly and erroneously casted doubt on every Republican electoral victory. In 2023, she asserted that the only why Republicans win elections was by “cheating.” ABC News engages in more stochastic terrorism.The View suggest Trump is going to steal the 2026 midterms. pic.twitter.com/LhsS5jWuzU— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) July 21, 2026 Earlier in the show, Behar and moderator Whoopi Goldberg suggested that Trump’s speech last week was “laying the ground work” for Trump to steal the 2026 election:GOLDBERG: The question is: do you think he's laying the ground work to contest the election? Hell, yeah!BEHAR: That speech was not about 2020. That speech was about 2026 and he is petrified that the Democrats are going to take over.“And there’s the perfect metaphor for his administration, the diarrhea outbreak,” Behar dumped. “The explosive diarrhea is just the perfect metaphor, because everything is going up and making a mess.”This kind of disinformation coming from a “bona fide news program” is what’s really making a mess in America.The transcript is below. Click expand to read:ABC’s The ViewJuly 21, 202611:03:50 a.m. Eastern()WHOOPI GOLDBERG: The question is: do you think he's laying the ground work to contest the election? Hell, yeah!JOY BEHAR: That speech was not about 2020. That speech was about 2026 and he is petrified that the Democrats are going to take over. That’s’ what all the poles are saying anyway. And here's why. We now have lost 17 service members in Iran and he has nothing -- no plan. The gas is up to 4 a gallon. Some diesel - I noticed a couple of diesel almost six.GOLDBERG: California gas very high.BEHAR: And now we’ve put 50 percent he tariff on Canada which is going to increase inflation and prices are going it go up. And there’s the perfect metaphor for his administration, the diarrhea outbreak.SUNNY HOSTIN: The explosive diarrhea?[Laughter]BEHAR: The explosive diarrhea is just the perfect metaphor, because everything is going up and making a mess.()11:06:15 a.m. EasternALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: It is really dangerous for us to lose faith in elections and he gives us a lot of reason to. States administer elections. They're still done at the state level. Attorneys general and states governors are getting ready for any kind of, you know, things and shenanigans that might happen. We have to show up and we have to trust our elections about our local ones and get out.BEHAR: You know, for the 10,000 years that I've been on this planet, this has never come up before! Have any - Does anyone remember?!HOSTIN: Well, there's no real evidence of election fraud. It's like 0.0003 percent of election fraud. So, it just doesn’t exist. It's a non-issue.BEHAR: Basically.HOSTIN: And you’re right, it's not something that has ever come up before.() Nicholas Fondacaro Tue, 07/21/2026 - 17:03 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title The View Denies Past Election Disputes Amid Trump Speech Controversy CNS Commentary Off Media Images Image ABC via SnapStream

20 hours ago
Newsbusters — News Tracking & Analysis | Real Narrative News