US visa: Lady shares three questions embassy official asked before approval

'rump Doesn'': Teleporting FEMA Official''bandons Jobt Know What Passports Are Used For

At this point, you have to ask yourself: who is this special commemorative passport for? Perhaps it's a special Trump passport for sex tourists traveling abroad? A pedophile passport, if you will. Whatever the case, it's clear that Trump doesn't know how passports are used. What's less clear is why this man is still in office. Source: Daily Beast Donald Trump on Friday unveiled a new commemorative passport that quickly sparked confusion online, with critics questioning whether the President understands what a passport is actually for. The President shared a sneak peek of what he called the U.S.A.'s New Passport on Truth Social, revealing a commemorative America250 design with a distinctly Trumpian twist. The U.S.A.'s New Passport, which says, 'Welcome, but be good!' President DJT, he wrote. A U.S. passport is issued to American citizens for international travel and is not a visa, green card, or citizenship document. It is not used to admit foreign visitors to the country, as many pointed out. Obvious to anyone with a brain, but not to Trump or the people who work for him. Ummmm US passports are used by US citizens traveling abroad. Welcome to what? pic.twitter.com/9Z3eqxkqxuread more

Rubio’s Reassurance Mission to Gulf Allies

Rubio’s Reassurance Mission to Gulf Allies acabral-sanche Wed, 06/24/2026 - 11:33 SVG Podcast Jun 23, 2026 The John Batchelor Show Rubio’s Reassurance Mission to Gulf Allies Mary Kissel Senior Fellow (Nonresident) Mary Kissel Podcast Caption Secretary of State Marco Rubio walks with Kuwaiti Foreign Minister Sheikh Jarrah Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah at the State Department on June 4, 2026, in Washington, DC. (Getty Images) Toggle Table of Contents Contents Contents Share to Twitter Twitter Share to Facebook Facebook Share to LinkedIn LinkedIn Share to E-mail E-mail Print Print Mary Kissel appears on The John Batchelor Show to discuss Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s travel to the Gulf to reassure the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Bahrain of United States security commitments following Iranian attacks. Kissel criticizes the administration for granting Iran sanctions relief and 60-day exemptions, arguing that the diplomatic effort prioritizes “hope over experience” regarding Iranian nuclear ambitions. Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to Hudson’s newsletters to stay up to date with our latest content. Email See more subscription options Foreign Policy Security Alliances

Advocates, lawmakers cheer birthright citizenship ruling

Advocates from an immigrant rights organization and U.S. lawmakers celebrated the U.S. Supreme Court decision rejecting President Trump's audacious attempt to restrict birthright citizenship in the United States. Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padilla of California hailed the ruling. #birthright #citizenship #supremecourt #trump #immigration #News #Reuters #Newsfeed Read the story here: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/supreme-court-spurns-trump-birthright-citizenship-allows-transgender-sports-bans-2026-06-30/ 👉 Subscribe: https://reut.rs/4b8fRGn Keep up with the latest news from around the world: https://www.reuters.com/ Follow Reuters on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reuters Follow Reuters on X: https://twitter.com/Reuters Follow Reuters on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reuters/?hl=en

The Supreme Court just came one vote away from a constitutional catastrophe

There is no question in US law that is clearly or more firmly settled than the question of whether people born in the United States are citizens of this country. The Fourteenth Amendment states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United []

'Happy Fourth of July': Eurasian leaders congratulate US on 250th anniversary of its independence

Azerbaijani, Belarusian, Kazakh, Moldovan, Uzbek presidents congratulate American counterpart

Ambassador Sheikh congratulates US on 250th Independence Anniversary, highlights enduring bilateral partnership

Ambassador Sheikh congratulates US on 250th Independence Anniversary, highlights enduring bilateral partnership

Another Argument For Supreme Overhaul

I’m with Josh Marshall on this Birthright Citizenship decision. It’s a relief that they didn’t go completely rogue. But the fact is that four justices found that the Constitution doesn’t say what it clearly says. That’s outrageous. Kav was cute saying that he concurred only on some arcane procedural grounds that could be quickly cleaned up by the MAGA majority, but he agreed that the 14th Amendment was apparently written in an alien language that isn’t the English we all speak. The MAGA court majority don’t need no stinkin’ precedents. They do what they want. The landmark case on this question is United States v. Wong Kim Ark from 1898. In many ways it is itself the most powerful validator of the argument. That is not because it has been the guiding precedent from over a century but the simple fact that it was decided the way that it was. It is very difficult to grasp how deeply racist a country the United States was at the tale end of the 19th century, in both a “hard” biological sense as well as a looser cultural one. It is not that anti-Asian racism was worth or more virulent than other forms of racism, though that’s arguable. But it had a particular character. For most white Americans, it would simply have been obvious that of course Chinese people could have no place in America, perhaps even more than Black Americans, though of course plenty thought the same about Black Americans. They were

Activists celebrate after Supreme Court refuses to end birthright citizenship

Advocates from an immigrant rights organisation and US lawmakers celebrated the US Supreme Court decision Tuesday rejecting Trump administration's attempt to restrict birthright citizenship in the United States. The justices in a 6-3 ruling authored by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts decided that US admin's directive violated language in the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment that confers citizenship to those born in the United States who are “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Subscribe: http://trt.world/subscribe Livestream: http://trt.world/ytlive Facebook: http://trt.world/facebook X (Twitter): http://trt.world/twitter Instagram: http://trt.world/instagram TikTok: http://tiktok.com/@trtworld WhatsApp: trtworld.com/whatsapp Telegram: https://t.me/trtworld Visit our website: http://trt.world

El Jalapeño: ICE Agents having a wonderful time at World Cup, jurisdictional questions remain

Technically, none of these people had valid U.S. visas, but then again, they weren't in the U.S. The post El Jalapeño: ICE Agents having a wonderful time at World Cup, jurisdictional questions remain appeared first on Mexico News Daily

‘Great optimism; it will happen soon’, says US State Dept Spox on India-US Interim trade agreement

American government officials have expressed 'great optimism' as discussions continue on the India-US trade agreement, hoping that it will conclude soon, State Department Spokesperson Margaret Macleod said on Thursday.

Ben Lowry: The hot night-time temperatures in Northern Ireland this week were almost at record-breaking levels

​On Thursday late afternoon I was at the US consul-general’s celebration of the 250th anniversary of US independence.

Supreme Court sides with Trump administration regarding asylum-seekers

The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and the Trump administration regarding when asylum-seekers officially arrive in the U.S.In a 6-3 decision split along ideological lines, the Court held that aliens seeking asylum do not “arrive in the United States” until they physically cross the border into the country and therefore are not entitled to inspection by border officials until they have entered onto U.S. soil.'An alien arrives in the United States only when he crosses the border.'The case stems from the federal government’s “metering” policy — first adopted in 2016 amid a surge of migrants at the southern border — that limited the number of aliens whom Customs and Border Patrol agents would inspect each day for asylum. When a port of entry reached capacity, officials physically prevented additional aliens from entering until capacity became available again. In 2017, asylum-seekers and Al Otro Lado, an immigration advocacy organization, brought forward a class-action lawsuit arguing that the federal government was unlawfully denying aliens access to asylum procedures. The federal district court in Southern California granted summary judgment in favor of the noncitizens and declared the government’s policy unlawful. The metering policy was then discontinued in November 2021, though the second Trump administration has attempted to revive it. A divided Ninth Circuit panel affirmed the summary judgment, ruling that an alien “arrives in the United States” when said alien — even while standing on the Mexico side of the border — encounters a U.S. official and thus must be inspected for asylum claims. Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito reversed the lower court’s ruling. The court held that the meaning of “arrives in the United States” requires physically entering the country. Therefore, under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, an alien standing on the Mexico side of the border is not entitled to inspection by a U.S. official. “We hold that an alien who is standing in Mexico does not ‘arriv[e] in the United States’ by attempting, and failing, to set foot in this country. An alien ‘arrives in the United States’ only when he crosses the border,” Alito wrote.RELATED: Ketanji Brown Jackson melts down over SCOTUS ruling against Hawaii gun law: 'The court's objective is protecting guns' U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justices Samuel Alito (L) and Clarence Thomas (R).Chip Somodevilla/POOL/AFP/Getty ImagesThe court highlighted the text of other INA provisions and subsequent amendments to the statute to indicate that Congress intended asylum and inspection rights to apply only after an alien enters the country. “That Congress amended §1158(a) in IIRIRA to replace ‘at a land border or port of entry’ with ‘arrives in the United States’ suggests that we should not read those phrases — which carry different ordinary meanings — to have the same meaning.”Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, arguing that Congress intended border officials to inspect and process all aliens who present themselves at ports of entry, regardless of whether they have physically stepped into the U.S. The dissent contended that the majority’s decision “ignores the statutory context and history” of the INA and weakens the asylum protections Congress created for people fleeing persecution. The Court today holds that the Executive Branch may circumvent all these mandatory procedures by having U.S. immigration officers stand at the border and physically block noncitizens from setting a foot onto U.S. soil.” Sotomayor added, The Court's illogical interpretation is driven almost entirely by a fixation on a single word: 'in.'Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Ex-U.S. official calls for diversification strategy for S. Korea's chip sector amid Hormuz disruptions

WASHINGTON, June 30 (Yonhap) -- A former senior U.S. official on Tuesday stresse...

Judge Corners DOJ for Covering Up Files on Trump’s 13-Year-Old Accuser

Evelyn Hockstein/REUTERSA federal judge has cornered the Justice Department for withholding files on FBI interviews with the woman who accused Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was 13. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to release unredacted versions of several Jeffrey Epstein files, or explain why the DOJ should be allowed to keep them secret, as he sided with investigative journalist Katie Phang, who had accused Blanche of violating the Epstein Files Transparency Act. He gave the government until July 2 to comply.Sullivan’s decision covers FBI notes from interviews with a woman who claimed that Epstein introduced her to Trump in 1984, when she was about 13 years old, and that Trump forced her to perform a sexual act on him. Trump has denied the allegation.Read more at The Daily Beast.

U.S. Embassy expresses gratitude to Azerbaijan

U.S. Embassy expresses gratitude to Azerbaijan

SCOTUS Rules | The Wrap Up | PragerU

The Supreme Court rules that women's sports are for women but affirms birthright citizenship and mail-in ballots. America races to the rescue after catastrophic earthquakes flatten parts of Venezuela. Texas puts the Bible back in the classroom for more than 5 million students. And over 250 runners are carrying a single American flag across the country on foot, racing to reach the nation's capital for America's 250th birthday. 📲 Watch our content ad-free on our app: https://prageru.onelink.me/3bas/vgyxvm79 Follow PragerU: Instagram ➡️ (https://www.instagram.com/prageru/) X ➡️ (https://twitter.com/prageru) Facebook ➡️ (https://www.facebook.com/prageru/) TikTok ➡️ (https://www.tiktok.com/@prageru)

Protecting US citizenship will be focus of Senate hearing

Protecting U.S. citizenship will be the subject of a Congressional hearing Wednesday, less than two weeks before Americans celebrate the 250th anniversary of the nation’s founding. The U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary’s Subcommittee on the Constitution will hold the hearing at the Dirksen Senate Office Building. The hearing comes as lawmakers continue debating issues []...Click to read more

[Photo] JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇺🇸 Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov congratulates the United States on its 2 [...]

JUST IN: Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov congratulates the United States on its 250th Independence Day anniversary.@BRICSNews

Woman swarmed by National Guard and US Marshals for dipping hand into reflecting pool: TMZ

A woman was allegedly issued a citation and escorted away from the reflecting pool on Monday after dipping her hand into the water, TMZ reported.Members of the National Guard, U.S. Marshals, and police officers were seen questioning her at the location, according to TMZ. She declined to speak with TMZ after the incident.The Washington, D.C. landmark has been plagued with algae blooms, a dead duckling, and damage following a controversial multi-million dollar remodel.President Donald Trump on Monday threatened that anyone who vandalizes the monument would face 10 years in prison.The Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool is getting treated like the Mona Lisa these days ... and one woman got a ticket to prove it. pic.twitter.com/WcMn8WWt6t— TMZ (@TMZ) June 22, 2026

US-Australia alliance celebrates 75 years since landmark ANZUS Treaty signing

Acting US Ambassador to Australia Erika Olson reflects on the 75th anniversary of the signing of the ANZUS Treaty. “It’s the 75th anniversary of the ANZUS Treaty and really the formal beginning of our alliance,” Ms Olson told Sky News host Paul Murray. “Our real alliance began much earlier than that … but 75 years ago in San Francisco, we signed the ANZUS Treaty that has continued to shape the US-Australia alliance even today.”

Supreme Court Affirms Trump’s Authority in Immigration Matters - Twice

Supreme Court Affirms Trump’s Authority in Immigration Matters - Twice In two 6-3 decisions Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Trump’s Administration’s authority to manage immigration matters, including asylum and Temporarily Protected Status (TPS) policies. In both Mullin v. Al Otro Lado and Mullin v. Doe/Mullin v. Miot (consolidated), the high court sided with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Markwayne Mullin, reversing and remanding lower-court decisions. Associate Justice Samuel Alito authored both majority opinions. In Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, the court ruled that it is self-evident that a migrant has not “arrived” in the U.S. – unless that migrant has actually arrived in the U.S. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), a migrant cannot legally apply for inspection and asylum without being physically present in the U.S. or at a U.S. port of entry. The Ninth Circuit circumvented this requirement by ruling that an alien is deemed to have “arrived” in the U.S. while standing on the Mexico side of the border, as long as he or she encounters a United States official. The Supreme Court decision reverses the Ninth Circuit ruling: “The question in this case is when an alien who seeks to enter the United States from Mexico ‘arrives in the United States’ within the meaning of that phrase in two key INA provisions—8 U. S. C. §§1158(a)(1) and 1225(a)(1): when the alien is standing in Mexico at the border, or only when the alien crosses the border and enters the country?” “Held: An alien standing in Mexico does not ‘arriv[e] in the United States’ by attempting, and failing, to set foot in this country. An alien ‘arrives in the United States’ only when he crosses the border. The INA thus neither entitles an alien standing in Mexico to apply for asylum nor requires an immigration officer to inspect him.” The high court cites the American Heritage Dictionary’s definitions of “arrive” and “in” to rule that the phrase “arriving in the United States” carries its ordinary meaning. “The ruling is another major victory for the Trump Administration in seeking to curb undocumented entries,” George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley wrote in a social media post reacting to the decision. “Justice Sotomayor's dissent comes off as positively Clintonesque in debating what the meaning of ‘in’ is,” Prof. Turley chided in a separate post, adding “Apparently, you can be in the United States without being ‘in’ the United States...” In its ruling, the Supreme Court also rejected a lower court’s effort to override President Trump’s statutory authority to manage immigration issues, as Justice Clarence Thomas explains in his concurring opinion: “I write separately to address two further problems with the (lower court’s) decision below. First, the District Court appeared to effectively grant the classwide injunctive relief that Congress has prohibited in this context. See 8 U. S. C. §1252(f ). Second, the relief that the District Court provided may well have unconstitutionally infringed on the President’s inherent authority to exclude aliens from the country. “The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) imposes various restrictions on judicial review of immigration enforcement.” “[T]he President has inherent authority to exclude aliens from the country,” Thomas writes, citing precedent: “So, any statute that forced the President to allow aliens to cross the border against his will would appear to exceed Congress’s enumerated powers, and a court could not enforce it against the President.” In the case of Mullin vs. Doe, the Supreme Court again affirmed the president’s authority to manage immigration matters, ruling that courts cannot block the Trump Administration from ending TPS for Haitian and Syrian nationals, not even temporarily. Additionally, the court said that the challengers’ race‑discrimination claim in the case “will likely fail.” “The question presented is whether respondents, who challenge the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for aliens from Syria and Haiti, are entitled to orders postponing the terminations during litigation,” according to the Supreme Court opinion, which provides background on the issue of TPS: “Congress created TPS in 1990 to provide short-term humanitarian relief for aliens who cannot safely return to their home countries. Although designed to afford temporary relief, TPS designations in practice have often lasted for decades.” Based on “extraordinary and temporary conditions,” Syria received a TPS designation in 2012 and Haiti received its designation in 2010. Syria’s TPS designation was granted because refugees were seeking to escape a brutal regime, which has long been replaced by other administrations. Haiti’s TPS designation was initially approved due to a devastating earthquake that hit the country, killing or injuring hundreds of thousands of residents, causing massive property damage, and severely worsening living conditions. In the 16 years since the earthquake ended, previous administrations have re-designated TPS for Haiti and repeatedly extended that status. “The Executive Branch retains discretion over whether to designate a country for TPS. Responsibility for TPS decisions rests with the Secretary of Homeland Security,” the opinion says, noting that “The TPS statute bars judicial review of non-constitutional claims.” What’s more, “None of the cited statements by either the President or the Secretary was overtly racial, and in substance all expressed policy views that could rest on race-neutral justifications,” the high court ruled, regarding the constitutionality question. The TPS statute requires the government to terminate a country’s TPS designation if the DHS secretary determines that the country “no longer continues to meet the conditions for designation.” The secretary is also required to review the necessity of each TPS designation every 18 months. In Executive Order 14159, titled “Protecting the American People Against Invasion,” Pres. Trump directed his cabinet officers to “ensur[e] that designations of Temporary Protected Status are consistent with the provisions of” the TPS statute and that such designations “are appropriately limited in scope and made for only so long as may be necessary to fulfill the textual requirements of that statute.” Furthermore, Thursday's decision rules that the Haitians challenging DHS's termination of their TPS status are not entitled to interim relief as the case plays out, since their “equal protection” constitutional claim is unsupportable. Just as in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, the seemingly obvious meaning of a word was challenged by those suing the DHS. At issue was the definition of the word “determination” in a provision of the TPS statute protecting DHS secretaries from judicial interference: “There is no judicial review of any determination of the [Secretary of Homeland Security] with respect to the designation, or termination or extension of a designation, of a foreign state under this subsection.” Once again, Justice Alito references clear dictionary definitions to establish that “determination” denotes the authority to make a firm decision. “This text is clear, and its plain meaning is very broad,” Justice Thomas agrees in his concurring opinion. “Big day for the Trump Administration on immigration,” Prof. Turley wrote in a post: “It is another big one: Mullin v. Doe. The court rules in favor of the Administration in ending the Temporary Protected Status for Syrian and Haitian nationals. Big day for the Trump Administration on immigration in combination with the Mullin v. Al Otro Lado.” Craig Bannister Thu, 06/25/2026 - 16:23 Marketing Timing Breaking Search Engine Title Supreme Court Backs Trump on Asylum and TPS Immigration Authority CNS Commentary Off

World : US State Department Announces Release Of Commemorative Passport To Celebrate America 250

WASHINGTON, July 3 (Bernama-Sputnik/RIA Novosti) -- The United States (US) Department of State has announced the release of a commemorative passport to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the country’s independence, reported Sputnik/RIA Novosti.

US Supreme Court rules against Trump's order to end birthright citizenship

The United States Supreme Court has just ruled against President Donald Trump’s Executive Order limiting automatic citizenship. As guaranteed under the 14th Amendment, US citizenship is granted to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States”. Trump had sought to end automatic citizenship for children born to parents in the country illegally or on temporary visas. His earlier executive order was blocked by lower courts, sending the case to the nation’s highest court. Al Jazeera’s Patty Culhane has the latest from the Supreme Court in Washington, DC. Subscribe to our channel: http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe Follow us on X: https://twitter.com/AJEnglish Find us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera Check our website: http://www.aljazeera.com/ Check out our Instagram page: https://www.instagram.com/aljazeeraenglish/ Download AJE Mobile App: https://aje.io/AJEMobile #US #USImmigration #BirthrightCitizenship #DonaldTrump #USPolitics #SupremeCourt #SCOTUS #14thAmendment #Citizenship #ImmigrationLaw #CivilRights #HumanRights #AlJazeeraEnglish

State Department Unveils America250 Passports at Trump’s Great American State Fair

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL—The Department of State is allowing the public to view the new America250 passports at the agency’s booth at the Great American State Fair. “Americans carry their passport as a symbol of who they are and where they come from. Now, our commemorative passport will also allow them to carry a piece of our history and our values wherever they...

Woman Allegedly Raped by Trump and Epstein Fears for her Life – Judge Orders DOJ to Unredact her Files

Last week, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) to turn over unredacted versions from some of the Epstein files that have been heavily redacted. The DOJ has until July 2nd (Thursday this week) to comply with the court order. One of the most anticipated unredacted files is the case of Katie Johnson, known as Jane Doe 4 in the Epstein files, and the FBI notes about her case from 2019. Many, including Congressman Thomas Massie, have criticized the DOJ for redacting these files. A video of Katie Johnson in what appears to be a deposition has been on the Internet for several years now, describing what she went through as she says she was raped by Epstein and Trump when she was 13 years old. We have a copy you can watch. With this new court order to unredact the FBI interviews with Katie, referred to as Jane Doe 4, The Guardian is reporting today that she fears for her life, and is now in hiding off grid. The post Woman Allegedly Raped by Trump and Epstein Fears for her Life – Judge Orders DOJ to Unredact her Files first appeared on Health Impact News.

Gulf Countries do Not Support Tolls in the Strait: Marco Rubio | Dawn News English

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says Gulf countries do not support imposing tolls on vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz, a key global energy route. The remarks come as international attention remains focused on maritime security, trade routes, and regional tensions. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most important shipping chokepoints, with any disruption carrying potential consequences for oil markets, energy prices, and the global economy. Watch the latest developments and what the debate means for Gulf security, international trade, and geopolitics. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dawn News English is your window into the latest news, insight, and features from South Asia and beyond. Website: www.dawn.com Official Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/dawnnewsenglish Official Twitter: https://x.com/dawnnewsenglish Official Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dawnnewsenglish #straitofhormuz #marcorubio #gulfsecurity #energysecurity #oilmarkets #middleeast #geopolitics #dawnnewsenglish #news #latestnews #dawnnewsenglish #dawnnews

Russia says ready to approve final US-Iran agreement in UN Security Council

Reaching a final agreement between the United States and Iran is stipulated in paragraph 3 of the memorandum of understanding, Maria Zakharova said

Read how lady who relocated to US got her green card

A Nigerian lady who relocated to the United States with a spousal visa celebrated as she got her green card. She shared how long she waited before she got it.

Prime Minister Davis Speaks at the United States of America’s 250th Anniversary of Independence Celebrations

Ambassador Walker. Mrs. Walker. Members of the Diplomatic Corps. Distinguished guests. Friends. Good evening. Tonight, we mark a remarkable milestone. Two hundred and fifty years ago, a new nation was born. It declared that all are created equal. It declared that liberty is the birthright of every soul. And it set out to prove that [] The post Prime Minister Davis Speaks at the United States of America’s 250th Anniversary of Independence Celebrations appeared first on ZNS BAHAMAS.

Incoming US ambassador 'honored to serve'

Incoming US ambassador 'honored to serve'

Message to Americans on this 250th anniversary from real Presidents [Interesting]

[link] [1 comments]

US Citizenship: Entitled Birthright or Outdated Privilege? Supreme Court Overrules Trump

On tonight's W News Extra with Leigh-Ann Gerrans, we are joined by Alex Malouf and Michael Jabri-Pickett. We discuss the latest developments in the US-Iran negotiations as American and Iranian delegations meet in Qatar. Plus, we examine the US Supreme Court's decision to uphold birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order. We also reflect on the anti-immigration protests in South Africa as an unofficial deadline comes into effect. And should refugees repay taxpayers for the support they received once they begin earning a salary? #USIran #Iran #USA #Trump #Qatar #Doha #Diplomacy #Negotiations #StraitOfHormuz #SupremeCourt #BirthrightCitizenship #Citizenship #Immigration #SouthAfrica #AntiImmigration #Protests #Refugees #Migrants #Starmer #Politics #GlobalNews #InternationalNews