United’s Argument That a Window Seat Doesn’t Guarantee a Window Gets Rejected by Judge, Forcing Airline to Face Lawsuit

United Airlines will face a lawsuit over charging extra for windowless window seats

A federal judge rejected the carrier's argument that window seat referred only to seat location, not a guaranteed view outside

United argued that a window seat is just a seat near a wall

I mean, you could put a window in the wall? United Airlines tried to argue that a window seat does not necessarily include a window, which is the kind of corporate reasoning that makes a person check whether airplane still means airplane. — Read the rest The post United argued that a window seat is just a seat near a wall appeared first on Boing Boing.

NDC deregistration: Peter Obi once benefitted from judicial decisions — Gov Sani

The governor said politicians should not applaud the courts when judgments favour them and condemn the judiciary whenever decisions go against their interests. The post NDC deregistration: Peter Obi once benefitted from judicial decisions — Gov Sani appeared first on Vanguard News.

Israel police chief says force will obey all High Court rulings after spokesman declines to rule out defiance

Danny Levy's remarks come after the police spokesman declined to rule out defying the court if its rulings conflicted with the position of Itamar Ben-Gvir. 'We obey the law,' he said. 'Regardless of anyone's political views'

Who Will Have To Answer To The Judge?

Because someone will. They need to explain something. They will need to explain it well, because it appears that something that was dictated by the judge in court has not been done. This could have consequences. And if it was done, there’s still a second question to answer. Gratitude for Raw Story: A federal judge

Giddy conservative’s claim debunked to his face on CNN: ‘They conflate everything’

A conservative commentator yelped with delight over the U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding the federal government’s policy of turning back asylum seekers before they can reach the border, and a fellow CNN panelist calmly dismantled his argument. The justices ruled 6-3 that a policy adopted in response to a surge of Haitian immigrants did not []

Gov’t says it will ignore Supreme Court ruling on new council overseeing public broadcaster

The government unanimously approved the proposal on Sunday.

Once Again, A Missouri Judge Strikes Down State’s Abortion Restrictions

At a certain point, you’d think the Missouri state legislature would take the hint, but nope, the state attorney general intends to appeal the ruling.

United must face lawsuit over 'window seats' that don't have windows, judge rules

A federal judge ruled passengers plausibly alleged United Airlines breached its agreement by selling certain window seats without an actual window, allowing the proposed class action to proceed.

Paul Vallas: Making the SAFE-T Act safe – Illinois Policy

... (T)o fulfill its promise the SAFE-T Act needs to give judges less discretion, not more. This can be done without restoring bail but by mandating no pretrial release for certain offenses and placing the discretion and proof burden on the defense to justify waiving that requirement.

US Supreme Court paves way for rollback of TPS protections for Haitians, Syrians

Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito said the law allows no judicial review of any presidential administration’s termination of TPS designation. He also rejected the claim of a race motive in the Trump administration's order.

Is the French judiciary against Palestine?

A recent decision by a French court seems to deny the widely accepted right of occupied populations to resist.

Judge rejects defense request to take death penalty off table for shooting of Charlie Kirk * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh

Source link Tyler Robinson A judge in Utah has rejected a defense request that the death penalty be taken off the table in the case over the assassination of conservative

DOJ Asks Supreme Court to Approve No-Bond Immigration Detention Policy

Conflicting appeals court rulings have caused confusion, and ‘geographical happenstance’ shouldn’t govern detention, the government argued.

Labour's jury trial reforms are a threat to free speech, says former High Court judge

A former High Court judge has warned that Labour's plans to curtail the right to trial by jury pose a direct threat to freedom of speech and protest. Sir Stephen Mitchell argues that jury trials are a critical safeguard against politically motivated prosecutions—particularly in Public Order cases where free expression is at stake—and that removing them would hand the Government a mechanism to bypass that protection in sensitive cases.

High Court demands answers on State Comptroller vote

After the Knesset refused to hold a repeat vote, the High Court issues an order to explain why the appointment of the State Comptroller should go through.

Ben Woodfinden: Finally — new Supreme Court justice doesn’t think he’s above Parliament

Glenn Joyal has been warning about judicial overreach for decades

Mistrial declared in Palisades Fire arson case; jury deadlocked

A judge has declared a mistrial in the case against a former Uber driver accused of sparking the most destructive fire in Los Angeles history. Jurors said they were deadlocked on all three felony counts. Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/ktla?sub_confirmation=1

US DoJ Says Adani Case Should Never Have Been Brought, Urges Judge To Drop Charges

The DOJ said requiring prosecutors to publicly justify decisions to drop cases would discourage future dismissals, expose privileged internal deliberations and infringe on the executive branch's...

Semantan Estate fails in bid to postpone Duta Enclave compensation assessment

High Court rules if stay of proceedings allowed, it will cause prejudice to defendant.

[OPINION] Why impeachments are too important to be left to lawyers alone

Lawyers might revel in procedure, but the public judges politically. Citizens evaluate trust, legitimacy and abuse of office.

Citizenship, Not Scrutiny

In BPJ, the Court gives a win to conservatives but retains a problematic framework for interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment.

Marine Le Pen conviction: 'It's very French to think that preventing one person from running undermines democracy as a whole'

In the far-right leader's appeals trial, judges confirmed, once again, the courts' wariness of intervening too heavily in the political arena.

Prosecution Challenges Judge’s Decision To Direct Acquittal In Deadly Accident Case

NASSAU, BAHAMAS - Prosecutors have challenged a judge's decision to direct a jury to acquit a man accused of causing a fatal accident.

The Supreme Court retirement clock is ticking: Byron York

Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York suggested that Supreme Court justices considering retirement should not assume Republicans will be able to confirm judicial nominees indefinitely. Weighing in on the speculation surrounding possible retirements from the court, York said he has no direct knowledge that any justice is preparing to step down. “I don’t have []

'Absurd' to suggest Dublin stabbing accused did not intend to kill, jury told

The defence barrister urged the jury not to view Bouchaker as a monster and said vengeance should have no place in the courtroom as he urged them to look at the case with calm and intelligence

Some thoughts on the U.S. v Hemani Decision

We wrote about the U.S. v Hemani case when the oral arguments took place, and the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision written by Justice Gorsuch is consistent with what we wrote. The concurring decision by Justices Jackson and Sotomayer is comical in its logical errors, and we will discuss that at the end of this post. [] The post Some thoughts on the U.S. v Hemani Decision appeared first on Crime Prevention Research Center.

SCOTUS Pasting Birth Tourism Into The Constitution Demands A Legal System Rebuild

That a court with six Republican-appointed justices could hand down such a patently un-American decision is an indictment of America's rogue legal system.

<i>Obergefell</i>, 11 Years On

The question of whether the Supreme Court should revisit the decision, as it did Roe, is on the table.

What Happens If Politicians Ignore SCOTUS?

The fight between John Fetterman and Zohran Mamdani over defying a Supreme Court immigration ruling is less about one mayor and one senator than about a deeper stress test of American constitutional culture: what happens when local officials treat a contested Court as morally illegitimate, and national politicians insist that ignoring it is, by definition, []

PRN Johor bukan medan bebaskan Najib

SERI KEMBANGAN: Pilihan Raya Negeri (PRN) Johor tidak seharusnya dijadikan medan untuk membebaskan individu yang telah disabitkan kesalahan di mahkamah. Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (ADUN) Seri Kembangan, Abbas Azmi berkata, sebarang usaha mengaitkan kemenangan pilihan raya dengan pembebasan seseorang adalah tidak wajar kerana kedua-duanya melibatkan proses berbeza. Katanya, pilihan raya diadakan bagi memberikan mandat mentadbir ... Read more The post PRN Johor bukan medan bebaskan Najib appeared first on Utusan Malaysia.

Trump foe John Bolton pleads guilty in classified information case

His plea agreement may enable him to avoid time behind bars, but the judge will ultimately decide his punishment

Federal Court upholds Syed Saddiq acquittal in RM1m Armada case with split 2–1 ruling

PUTRAJAYA, July 13 — The Federal Court today upheld Muar MP Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman’s acquittal on fou...

Casement Uncertainty

Casement Uncertainty

‘A red line has been crossed’: UEFA blasts FIFA over Balogun reprieve

The body argued that an automatic one-match suspension following a red card is not a discretionary option. The Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) has issued a scathing statement condemning (The post ‘A red line has been crossed’: UEFA blasts FIFA over Balogun reprieve is from Doha News | Qatar.)

Jay Jones Is Unfit for the Office of Attorney General

“As Virginia voters cast their votes for the state’s next attorney general, they face a clear choice between principled leadership and blatant disregard for a legal system they’ll be tasked with enforcing.” Read More HERE.READ MORE

Judge to bring US Attorney Boutros to court over Tren de Aragua case

CHICAGO — A federal magistrate judge on Wednesday refused to cancel a hearing where U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros potentially would have to explain why he publicly discussed murder and kidnapping charges against three reputed members of the Tren ...

EDITORIAL: Our kingdom for a French dictionary?

Should courts dictate to the Crown who cannot be their representatives in this country?

When Will AZ-01 Democrats Answer On Supreme Court Ruling Protecting Girls Sports?

Following today’s landmark 6-3 Supreme Court decision protecting girls’ and women’s sports, Democrats Amish Shah, Marlene Galan-Woods and Jonathan Treble must answer a simple question: Will they respect this ruling? Or would they vote to overturn it, forcing biological males into girls’ locker rooms, bathrooms and sports teams? President Trump-endorsed conservative and dad Jay Feely praised the victory: “The Supreme [] The post When Will AZ-01 Democrats Answer On Supreme Court Ruling Protecting Girls Sports? appeared first on NRCC.

[Photo] 🚨 In a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court rules that courts cannot review the government’s d [...]

In a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court rules that courts cannot review the government’s decisions to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Syria and Haiti and says the challengers’ race‑discrimination claim is unlikely to succeed.https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2070151671338995925?s=46

Knesset speaker rules out new vote for state comptroller despite court concerns

The matter now returns to the High Court, which will determine whether the vote can stand or whether Michael Rabello's appointment should be invalidated.