Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision reignites Rand Paul’s push for constitutional amendment

‘Let’s get it done’: Rand Paul outlines the ultimate fix for Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship activism * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh

Source link Rand Paul Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., has explained his one absolute fix for the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship activism. That opinion written by John Roberts claims that the

Rep. Chip Roy calls to pause immigration after Supreme Court ruling

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, ripped the Supreme Court for upholding the birthright citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment in an appearance Tuesday on Newsmax. “The United States Supreme Court issued an opinion today that is massively damaging to the national security and to the fabric of our country, and it is incumbent upon the United []...Click to read more

GOP figures break with Trump on birthright ruling, argue constitutional amendment necessary

Several prominent elected Republicans with law backgrounds on Tuesday broke with President Trump on the Supreme Court's ruling over birthright citizenship, arguing that a constitutional amendment would have to be passed to change this method of obtaining citizenship. The high court ruled 6-3 that the 14th Amendment automatically guarantees citizenship for nearly all children born...

Congressional Republicans split over Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship ruling

Congressional Republicans were divided over the Supreme Court’s Tuesday decision to strike down an executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment. While many Republicans called for congressional action in response to the ruling, other Republicans celebrated the decision as “well-reasoned.” “This decision affirms that anyone born in the United States is []

Birthright Citizenship vs. 'We the People'

The Supreme Court has finally weighed in on birthright citizenship, and to the frustration of conservatives across the nation, they got it wrong. Simply saying that today is enough to invite endless ridicule from those who insist the Constitution plainly and unambiguously grants citizenship to anyone born on American soil. There is little interest in engaging with the intended purpose of the 14th Amendment, its historical context, or whether that interpretation serves the long-term interests of the nation. Yet the same people who demand a strictly literal reading of the 14th Amendment rarely apply that standard consistently to the rest of the Constitution.