Supreme Court seeks to rewrite, not interpret, the Constitution

<i>Obergefell</i>, 11 Years On

The question of whether the Supreme Court should revisit the decision, as it did Roe, is on the table.

Supreme Court allows a ruling that ends a tool to protect minority voters in 7 states

The Supreme Court has left in place a ruling that strikes down a key tool for enforcing Voting Rights Act protections for voters with a disability or an inability to read or write in seven states.

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Arguments on a Case That Could Truly Gut the Anti-Gun Left

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Arguments on a Case That Could Truly Gut the Anti-Gun Left

Trump dealt major blow with birthright citizenship ruling | The Excerpt

Another Supreme Court term has wrapped with major rulings that reshape key national debates. The court upheld birthright citizenship, rejecting a central push from President Donald Trump, while also siding with states on restricting transgender athletes from competing in girls’ sports. USA TODAY Court Reporter Aysha Bagchi joins The Excerpt to unpack what these decisions mean. Read more: https://tinyurl.com/2fzrkvf5 Sign up for our newsletter for the day's top stories, from sports to movies to politics to world events: https://profile.usatoday.com/newsletters/daily-briefing/

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Bans On Trans Athletes In School Sports

The U.S. Supreme Court, in an opinion released Tuesday, voted 6-3 in support of two state laws that ban trans girls and women from playing women's sports at public schools and universities. The ruling applies directly to bans in two states—Idaho and West Virginia—while bolstering similar bans in more than two dozen others. Writing for the three votes against—all of which came from the court's liberal wing—Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that to the court's majority the facts do not matter, even though the consequences are serious. Sports, of course, are often zero sum, Sotomayor wrote, but the law need not and should not be.

FOR INSIDERS | Supreme Court's 6-3 cases: When did justices split along ideological lines?

The Supreme Court split along its 6-3 ideological lines in nearly a quarter of the argued cases this term. The battles were big and small, from President Trump’s agenda to thorny disputes over the meaning of securities statutes. All but two came down in June, the final month of opinion season. Meanwhile, nearly half the cases...

High Court hears challenge to judicial selection overhaul, justices warn of bias in judges

High Court hears petitions challenging the judicial selection overhaul, all 11 justices question whether the changes shift appointments toward political control and threaten judicial independence.

The Supreme Court's Women's Sports Ruling Will Echo Long After the Birthright Debate

The Supreme Court's Women's Sports Ruling Will Echo Long After the Birthright Debate

Supreme Court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter turbocharges presidential power

The U.S. Supreme Court – with its six conservative justices, three of whom were nominated by President Donald Trump – has recently reversed landmark decisions that have long guided American government and society. Over the last few years, the ...

Trump v. Barbera shows just how radical the Roberts Court and the modern conservative legal movement are

When Sarah Ishgur and other apologists for the incredibly reactionary and partisan Roberts Court summarize the latest term, they’re sure to highlight the Supreme Court confirming that Donald Trump cannot unilaterally nullify the plain language and purpose of the 14th Amendment and more than a century of precedent. THIS IS A COURT THAT WILL STAND [] The post Trump v. Barbera shows just how radical the Roberts Court and the modern conservative legal movement are appeared first on Lawyers, Guns Money.

Washington girls’ sports initiative gets major boost after Supreme Court victory

Brian Heywood says the Supreme Court's girls' sports ruling strengthens Washington's upcoming ballot initiative and could reshape future Title IX litigation.

Supreme Court term shows contrast between justices who dominate arguments versus decisions

The Supreme Court‘s recently concluded term was dominated by cases involving President Donald Trump, but different justices dominated different parts of the term, from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson‘s long questioning at arguments to Chief Justice John Roberts‘s near-perfect record of being in the majority ruling. The Supreme Court’s term began with oral arguments in Villarreal []

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship

Five of the six judges pointed out that the right was enshrined in the US Constitution

The Secret Origins of the Supreme Court’s Shadow Docket

Last month, the Supreme Court issued a number of landmark opinions involving transgender rights, campaign finance, executive power, and immigration. Those decisions were issued in the traditional way many of us recognize: pages and pages of arguments and citations, with each justice on the record voting yea or nay. But over the last decade, the []

We’re Not Doomed to Live With This Supreme Court’s Mistakes

Congress used to overturn several opinions practically every term.

SCOTUS Lets Trump End Protected Status for Endangered Syrian and Haitian Refugees

The Supreme Court’s right-wing majority ruled Thursday that courts cannot review non-constitutional challenges to the Department of Homeland Security’s decision...

Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling That Strips Minority Voter Protections Across Seven States

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review a lower court ruling, effectively ending a key legal tool used to protect minority voters in seven states. By refusing to take up an Arkansas-based lawsuit, the justices left in place a 2025 appeals panel decision affecting Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. [] The post Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling That Strips Minority Voter Protections Across Seven States appeared first on Foreign Policy Journal.

Class-action lawsuit over deadly Toronto shooting clears another legal hurdle

The Supreme Court of Canada will not review a ruling by Ontario's top court allowing survivors of mass shooting to proceed with a class-action lawsuit against a gunmaker.

Citizenship, Not Scrutiny

In BPJ, the Court gives a win to conservatives but retains a problematic framework for interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment.

US Supreme Court to hear gun, LGBT, voting rights cases in next term

US Supreme Court to hear gun, LGBT, voting rights cases in next term

America Is Due a Third Reconstruction

Michele Goodwin The nation can thank the Supreme Court for its periods of turmoil. It’s time for a new jurisprudence. The post America Is Due a Third Reconstruction appeared first on The Nation.

59 Years, Four Generations Later, Supreme Court Settles Land Dispute

The Supreme Court decided a seven-decade-old dispute over 15.5 bighas in a village of Haridwar.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Makes Trump a King

Good evening, this is Really American.

America’s Unaccountable Federal Judiciary

A group of law students petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to take up a case that exposes a glaring contradiction in American law. ... The post America’s Unaccountable Federal Judiciary appeared first on The New American.

Time for Democrats to Plan Expansion of Supreme Court

Michael Tomasky, editor of The New Republic, concludes that the U.S. Supreme Court has become too partisan. The public does not trust its judgments. Term limits won’t change it soon enough. He proposes expanding the Court and gives his rationale. He wrote: Was Thursday among the darkest days in the history of the Supreme Court? []

What the Supreme Court rulings mean for presidential power

The U.S. Supreme Court issued two major rulings on Monday that significantly expand presidential power and President Trump's attempt to further reshape the federal government. Amna Nawaz discussed more with Supreme Court analyst and SCOTUSblog co-founder Amy Howe.

Ben Woodfinden: Finally — new Supreme Court justice doesn’t think he’s above Parliament

Glenn Joyal has been warning about judicial overreach for decades

Gorsuch Skewers SCOTUS For Ducking Covid Shot Mandate Case

'I hope, too, that one day soon this Court will choose to settle the question so that other Americans seeking to vindicate their civil rights do not suffer the same fate as those now before us.'

JOHN YOO: The left's Supreme Court panic collapses under the weight of the facts

In the term that just ended, the Supreme Court demonstrated that it takes its bearings more from the original understanding of the Constitution than from Trump.

High-Stakes Georgia Election Rules Fight Pushed Straight To State Supreme Court

The Court of Appeals of Georgia issued an order on Thursday, transferring a major legal battle over state election rules to the Supreme Court of Georgia. The case, Georgia Republican Party Inc. v. DeKalb County Board of Registration and Elections, is moving to the state’s highest bench because it raises fundamental constitutional questions that intermediate [] High-Stakes Georgia Election Rules Fight Pushed Straight To State Supreme Court

[Photo] 🚨Supreme Court to hear case next term on challenges to Arizona’s efforts to remove no [...]

Supreme Court to hear case next term on challenges to Arizona’s efforts to remove noncitizens from its voter rolls. Read more in article linked below. https://thefederalist.com/2026/05/27/trump-doj-asks-scotus-to-weigh-arizonas-commonsense-proof-of-citizenship-laws/

‘Miscarriage of justice’: Trump calls on Supreme Court to fix its birthright citizenship ruling * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh

Source link Supreme Court justices in 2022 President Donald Trump is calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to fix its “miscarriage of justice” that it delivered to the American people

After SCOTUS Fails to Act, States Must Step Up to Save Election Day

DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION—The current conservative Supreme Court rarely gets it wrong when it comes to election administration. But in this week’s ruling in Watson v. RNC, that reliable majority flipped on its head with Justices John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett siding with the liberals by holding that, despite plain language in federal law dictating...

Supremes’ Memo to Lower Courts: Presidential Power Trumps Leftist Lawfare

Supremes’ Memo to Lower Courts: Presidential Power Trumps Leftist Lawfare

Décision de la Cour suprême: Aux Etats-Unis, les demandeurs d'asile pourront être renvoyés

Les juges conservateurs de la Cour suprême des Etats-Unis ouvrent la voie au retour d'une politique musclée contre les migrants à la frontière mexicaine, abandonnée sous la présidence de Joe Biden.

The Long-Awaited Supreme Court Fight Over AR-15 Bans Is Finally Here

After years of legal battles and unanswered questions, the Supreme Court is finally set to weigh in on one of the biggest Second Amendment fights in America.

In a Bit of a Surprise, CO Supreme Court Knocks Down Dem Redistricting Plan

In a Bit of a Surprise, CO Supreme Court Knocks Down Dem Redistricting Plan

What They Are Saying: SCOTUS ruling supercharges NRSC’s political firepower ahead of November

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Earlier this week, the Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC, reshaping the landscape of U.S. elections by allowing political party committees to spend without limit in direct coordination with their candidates. Republicans, who have spent years preparing for this moment, are poised to immediately benefit from this []