Reform's Makerfield by-election candidate declares 'tide is changing' against Labour: 'They've been ignored for 40 years!'

Reform UK's by-election candidate for Makerfield has declared the tide is changing against the Labour Government, accusing the party of taking the people for granted.Speaking to GB News, plumber Robert Kenyon hit out at the Labour Government, criticising it for ignoring the people of Makerfield for 40 years.Having spoken with voters in Makerfield, Mr Kenyon said the biggest issue affecting people on the doorstep is the fact they have been ignored by Labour.He told GB News: The biggest underlying issue is they have been ignored for the past 40 years. We've knocked on doors that haven't had a knock on the door from any political party in the last 40 years.So the underlying reason is just being ignored, basically taken for granted that they're just going to vote for Labour all this time, and that tide is changing now.Pressed on whether he can promise that the people will no longer be ignored, Mr Kenyon agreed 100 per cent. TRENDING Stories Videos Your Say He said: I love speaking to people on the doorsteps. Even if they are voting for Labour or whoever, I'll still listen to them.They've still got a voice and I'll still represent them. If they do get elected and they do vote for a different party, I'll still be the MP. I'll still listen to them and represent them as best they can.Quizzed on Labour candidate Andy Burnham, Mr Kenyon was asked what he would do differently to the Greater Manchester Mayor for the people of Makerfield.The Reform candidate made clear: What I would do differently from Andy is I'd actually stay in the area and be the MP for this area, not try and use it as a stepping stone to other things.If Andy Burnham was elected, there's a very good chance that he would be our next Prime Minister and he'd never be anywhere near the area. So the difference with me is Makerfield needs an MP, a local MP to listen to the people. If Andy was elected, you'd never see him in the area, so I think it would be detrimental to the people of Makerfield.Turning to the issues affecting Britons, Mr Kenyon highlighted that illegal migration is one of the biggest concerns for voters in Makerfield.He explained: The plan on illegal immigration definitely isn't working. Shabana Mahmood might put in plans to deal with net migration, but I think the biggest problem that people are feeding back to us on the streets is illegal immigration, so that's not working.LATEST DEVELOPMENTS‘Respect our culture and heritage!’ Reform council leader backs calls to make meetings English onlyMPs to debate UK rejoining EU after Labour opens door to Brexit 'betrayal'Greens hand Andy Burnham huge Makerfield boost as Labour given clear run against Reform UKThat needs to change rapidly because it puts a massive strain on our infrastructure. It puts a massive strain on our policing, our hospitals.Mr Kenyon revealed a lack of regulation in Houses of Multiple Occupancy which accommodate asylum seekers, particularly in Wigan.He told GB News: You only need to look at a place like Wigan, we've got over 200 HMOs, maybe 300. They're not regulated. We don't exactly know the people who are coming in, coming into the country illegally. There's a potential risk there, potential danger. So I'd say that needs the attention of the Labour Party in the Government ASAP.Asked for his verdict on Labour's call to ban social media for under-16s, Mr Kenyon agreed with the stance of Sir Keir Starmer to implement a ban.He said: I'm not saying what the party's opinion is, but I think social media can be very toxic environments, and there are a lot of negatives that come out of social media. Me personally, I don't see any reason why anyone under 16 would be on social media. I think it could be very negative, and we've seen a lot of mental health issues come out of it, especially for under-16s, online bullying and so on and so forth. So for me personally, I'm definitely not a fan of social media for under-16s, but that's just my opinion. Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter