Ottawa tight-lipped on joining legal case against Trump sanction of Canadian ICC judge

Ottawa mum on joining legal case against Trump’s sanctioning of Canadian ICC judge

OTTAWA — Ottawa won’t say whether it will intervene in support of a Winnipeg-born global judge who is asking a U.S. court to reverse sanctions ordered by U.S. President Donald Trump, which have left her unable to use a credit card or most major online vendors. Washington sanctioned International Criminal Court judge Kimberly Prost nearly [] The post Ottawa mum on joining legal case against Trump’s sanctioning of Canadian ICC judge appeared first on Loonie Politics.

FIRST READING: Even the new ‘conservative’ Supreme Court justice has a weakness for identity politics

Glenn Joyal compelled Manitoba lawyers to state their pronouns in court, and seeks a 'tri-jural' system where Indigenous law is co-equal with Canadian law

ROBSON: Trump’s Haiti ruling is about to test Canada’s border security

A court ruling in Washington can become a border test in Quebec within days. That is the lesson Ottawa should draw from the United States (US) Supreme Court’s decision in Mullin v. Doe, which cleared the way for the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for nationals of Haiti and Syria while litigation continues. The Canadian Press reported that the decision applies to about 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians who were in the US under the program.

Alberta Deserves Better

Alberta's Choice | "The Federalists" think they're some sort of superheroes, but really, they look like the HR department of a pipeline protest. Federalism had its chance. Alberta deserves better. Learn more at: https://www.albertas-choice.com/content Authorized by Alberta's Choice | (780) 800-9577 | www.Albertas-Choice.com

Update on The Ohio Coalition for Police Accountability and Transparency

This is where we are at with my Federal civil rights litigation. We are reaching out to provide a transparent update on the status of our federal civil rights litigation, Cynthia Brown v. Dave Yost (Case No. 2:24-cv-01401). ​As of July 2, 2026, we have passed the 210-day mark since our last major briefings were submitted to the court. We know many of you are waiting—just as we are—for a final ruling from Judge Graham regarding our request for a permanent injunction.