In Gift to Billionaires, Supreme Court Buys Vance's Argument Against Post-Watergate Campaign Finance Rule

Just days after Vice President JD Vance suggested that if Watergate happened today, it would barely make the news, let alone end a presidency, the US Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority on Tuesday embraced the Republican's argument against a 1974 campaign finance rule that Congress passed in response to the seismic scandal.Specifically, the court struck down restrictions on political parties coordinating campaign spending with candidates. The ruling is the result of a 2022 lawsuit filed by Vance, then a Republican Senate candidate in Ohio; Steve Chabot, then a GOP congressman from the same state; and the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) and its House counterpart.The high court had previously upheld the rule in 2021, but as with the 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which opened the floodgates to unlimited campaign spending by corporations and ultrarich individuals via super political action committees (PACs), the majority cited the First Amendment to the US Constitution in its 6-3 decision in NRSC v. FEC. The three liberals dissented. Michael Beckel, director of money in politics reform at the group Issue One, stressed that Tuesday's decision opening up a new avenue for wealthy donors and special interests to buy favor with political candidates is part of a string of disastrous campaign finance rulings from the Roberts Court that began with Citizens United and have left our political system awash in large contributions that most Americans could never dream of giving.Brett Edkins, managing director of policy and political affairs for the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, similarly declared that the right-wing supermajority on the Supreme Court thinks Citizens United didn't go far enough. Today they gave their blessing for billionaires to buy even more influence over the politicians who represent us.Americans deserve a Supreme Court that upholds our fundamental freedoms—not one that consistently sides with billionaire donors and diminishes the power of everyday citizens in our democracy, Edkins asserted, calling on Congress to add more members to the court once President Donald Trump finishes his second term in 2029.Congress should rein in this rogue court once Trump leaves office by enacting major reforms, including term limits, an enforceable code of ethics, and expanding the court with justices who will defend our democracy and our fundamental freedoms, he said. In the meantime, Americans will have to contend with the new ruling in the November midterms as well as the next presidential cycle in 2028. Along with calling out a high court that yet again twisted the First Amendment to help billionaires and corporations buy our elections and bend our government to their will, Public Citizen democracy advocate Jon Golinger argued Tuesday that we have to combat this outcome by increasing transparency so voters know who’s paying for election ads, empowering small donors and public matching funds, and passing the Democracy For All Amendment to empower Congress, the states, and the voters to put in place reasonable protections to guard against campaign finance corruption.The ruling came as Public Citizen released a report documenting the historic 517 million in corporate spending on the 2026 cycle so far—money that has largely gone to industry-prioritizing super PACs and the Trump-aligned MAGA Inc.Democratic Party leaders, who hope to reclaim majorities in both chambers of Congress this November, also ripped the new ruling. In a joint statement, Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin, as well as Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), who lead the party's campaign arms for each chamber, called it a win for billionaire donors and special interests who want more influence over the GOP agenda and an invitation for corruption. Republicans have failed the American people with a record that has ripped away healthcare and raised costs on families, and they know voters will hold them accountable in November—which is exactly why they are rewriting the rules in an effort to drown out the will of the voters by flooding elections with more money from their billionaire backers, they said.Democrats are fighting back for the American people, the trio added, and in November, voters will reject Republicans' toxic agenda and efforts to rig the system and weaken our democracy by electing a Democratic House and Senate majority.