ACLU, retired Judge sue Ron DeSantis over unfilled 3rd District bench seat

Court Looks To Decide Fate Of ‘Decoy’ Candidate With Same Name As Senator

The Alaska Supreme Court is hearing a case Monday that will decide whether or not to remove a Senate candidate with the same name as the incumbent he is challenging from the ballot. Republican Senate candidate Dan J

Justices to face Congress after contentious court rulings

WASHINGTON — Supreme Court justices are scheduled to appear before both Senate and House appropriators next week, marking the first time since 2019 that justices will face lawmakers. Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan are slated to ...

After Contentious Rulings, 2 Supreme Court Justices to Appear Before Congressional Panel Next Week

After a highly eventful session of Supreme Court rulings, two justices will testify before Congress next week. Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan will testify before the House Appropriations Committee July 14 about the budget for the Supreme Court. Barrett, nominated by President Donald Trump in 2020, is considered part of the conservative wing...

Judge Sides With UNC in Chavis Discrimination Case

Judge Sides With UNC in Chavis Discrimination Case sara.custer@in Mon, 07/06/2026 - 03:00 AM Byline(s) Sara Custer

[Photo] 🚨Supreme Court to hear case next term on challenges to Arizona’s efforts to remove no [...]

Supreme Court to hear case next term on challenges to Arizona’s efforts to remove noncitizens from its voter rolls. Read more in article linked below. https://thefederalist.com/2026/05/27/trump-doj-asks-scotus-to-weigh-arizonas-commonsense-proof-of-citizenship-laws/

Expanding the Supreme Court isn't court-packing

Adding four seats under the next Democratic trifecta would actually be unpacking the court.

Why are justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan testifying before Congress? Key details here

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan will appear before Congress. Read to know why

Wyoming judges: We must protect the independence of our judiciary

An independent judiciary is a safeguard not for judges — but for every American citizen, writes U.S. District Court Judges Alan B. Johnson, Kelly H. Rankin and Scott W. Skavdahl. The post Wyoming judges: We must protect the independence of our judiciary appeared first on WyoFile .

Supreme Court rules governments need not pay fair market value in tax foreclosures

Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Jackson.

Judge upholds oversight commission for Georgia prosecutors

Fulton County Superior Court judge upheld a state law that created an oversight commission for Georgia’s prosecutors. Senate Bill 92, passed by state lawmakers in 2023, established the Prosecuting Attorneys Qualifications Commission that would investigate local district attorneys. The public can file complaints on the commission’s website. DeKalb County District Attorney Sherry Boston, Augusta Judicial []...Click to read more

What They Are Saying: SCOTUS ruling supercharges NRSC’s political firepower ahead of November

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Earlier this week, the Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC, reshaping the landscape of U.S. elections by allowing political party committees to spend without limit in direct coordination with their candidates. Republicans, who have spent years preparing for this moment, are poised to immediately benefit from this []

Arizona Supreme Court Hands Heap Win Over Maricopa County Supervisors

Arizona Supreme Court Hands Heap Win Over Maricopa County Supervisors

A Missing Name Kills A Mental Health Worker’s Lawsuit, Nevada Supreme Court Rules

The Nevada Supreme Court has enforced state paperwork rules, tossing out an appeal from a fired state mental health supervisor because he failed to put the right name on his court petition. In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Lidia S. Stiglich, the state’s highest court ruled that the Eighth Judicial District Court had no [] A Missing Name Kills A Mental Health Worker’s Lawsuit, Nevada Supreme Court Rules

Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling That Strips Minority Voter Protections Across Seven States

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review a lower court ruling, effectively ending a key legal tool used to protect minority voters in seven states. By refusing to take up an Arkansas-based lawsuit, the justices left in place a 2025 appeals panel decision affecting Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. [] The post Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling That Strips Minority Voter Protections Across Seven States appeared first on Foreign Policy Journal.

Letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Leadership Regarding Justice Kagan’s Conflicted Interests in Upcoming Case

READ MORE

Bad Bunny tickets, $1 million book advance: Takeaways from Supreme Court financial disclosures

Last year, the Supreme Court justices received free concert tickets, money tied to lucrative book deals, and supplemental income from teaching jobs, according to a Washington Examiner review of the high court’s 2025 financial disclosure reports released on Monday. All but Justice Samuel Alito, who requested a deadline extension for the 15th consecutive year, filed []

Justice Barrett Defects on Mail Ballot Ruling – And Rightfully So

Justice Amy Coney Barrett is usually considered one of the Supreme Court’s reliable conservative voices. That is why many conservatives were stunned when she joined Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s three liberal justices in a 5 to 4 ruling that upheld Mississippi’s law allowing certain mail-in ballots to be counted after Election Day. [] The post Justice Barrett Defects on Mail Ballot Ruling – And Rightfully So appeared first on The Punching Bag Post.

Judge holds prosecutors in Charlie Kirk murder case in contempt for comments about his guilt

The Utah judge in the murder case over conservative activist's Charlie Kirk’s killing has held prosecutors in contempt of court over comments they made about defendant Tyler Robinson's guilt.

<i>Obergefell</i>, 11 Years On

The question of whether the Supreme Court should revisit the decision, as it did Roe, is on the table.

A landmark Texas ruling breathes new life into one detransitioner's quest for justice

Detransitioner Soren Aldaco called a Texas Supreme Court ruling a huge win that sets precedent for medical malpractice statute of limitations cases.

US Supreme Court to hear gun, LGBT, voting rights cases in next term

US Supreme Court to hear gun, LGBT, voting rights cases in next term

Two Supreme Court Justices Are Headed to Congress

Two Supreme Court Justices Are Headed to Congress

The Supreme Court – the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Part 2: the Bad – Deborah Chambers

The Supreme Court – the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Part 2: the Bad – Deborah Chambers

Trump administration asks high court to OK its unprecedented immigration detention policy

The U.S. Justice Department asked the justices to resolve a division among federal appeals courts.

Update on The Ohio Coalition for Police Accountability and Transparency

This is where we are at with my Federal civil rights litigation. We are reaching out to provide a transparent update on the status of our federal civil rights litigation, Cynthia Brown v. Dave Yost (Case No. 2:24-cv-01401). ​As of July 2, 2026, we have passed the 210-day mark since our last major briefings were submitted to the court. We know many of you are waiting—just as we are—for a final ruling from Judge Graham regarding our request for a permanent injunction.

Supreme Court to hear Arizona proof-of-citizenship voting case

Supreme Court to hear Arizona proof-of-citizenship voting case

Court Upholds David Mark-Led ADC Leadership, Dismisses Abejide’s Suit 

Federal High Court upholds David Mark's leadership of ADC, ruling the dispute was an internal party matter beyond judicial intervention.

NRCC and NRSC Applaud Supreme Court Victory for First Amendment in NRSC v. FEC

NRCC Chairman Richard Hudson (R-NC) and NRSC Chairman Tim Scott (R-SC) today applauded the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling in National Republican Senatorial Committee et al. v. Federal Election Commission, a victory for the First Amendment that strikes down unconstitutional limits on coordinated party spending. The Court held that federal restrictions capping how much political parties may spend in coordination [] The post NRCC and NRSC Applaud Supreme Court Victory for First Amendment in NRSC v. FEC appeared first on NRCC.

Alaska Supreme Court Hears Petersburg Dan Case; Decision Expected Today or Tomorrow

This morning, June 29, 2026, the Alaska Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case Dan J. Sullivan vs. Division of Elections, a case concerning the eligibility of a man named Daniel J. Sullivan, Jr. to appear on the November ballot alongside the incumbent Senator Daniel S. Sullivan. Both Democrats and Republicans recognize the race [] The post Alaska Supreme Court Hears Petersburg Dan Case; Decision Expected Today or Tomorrow appeared first on Must Read Alaska.

Iran opens hundreds of legal cases over US, Israeli aggression: Prosecutor general

Several rulings, including compensation judgments against Washington, have already been issued, with some entering the enforcement stage, says the prosecutor general.

Supreme Court Protects Girls, Upholds Reality

The Supreme Court decision on Little v. Hecox out of Idaho and West Virginia v. B.P.J. allows states to do what's right.

PRESS RELEASE: CEO Applauds SCOTUS Decision in Louisiana v. Callais

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: Shawna Bray(410) 598-5388 Wednesday, April 29, 2026 WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Center for Equal Opportunity (CEO) today praised the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais. CEO Chairman Linda Chavez applauded the ruling, noting that it is consistent with the colorblind, merit-based positions for which CEO has long advocated. In a majority opinion authored by Justice Alito, the Court held that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) “was designed to enforce the Constitution—not collide with it. Unfortunately, lower courts have sometimes applied this Court’s §2 precedents in a way that forces States to engage ... Read More

Judge tosses remnants of Proud Boys seditious conspiracy case, citing Trump’s broad clemency

WASHINGTON — A federal judge has dismissed the remnants of the government’s landmark case against far-right Proud Boys members who were convicted of seditious conspiracy for plotting to attack the Capitol to keep President Trump in the White House after he lost his reelection bid more than five years ago. The case’s dismissal late Friday became a []

Supreme Court allows a ruling that ends a tool to protect minority voters in 7 states

The Supreme Court has left in place a ruling that strikes down a key tool for enforcing Voting Rights Act protections for voters with a disability or an inability to read or write in seven states.

Trump admin loses in court as judge shuts down attempts to subpoena Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, other Dem leaders in immigration crackdown dispute

A federal judge has delivered a major legal setback to the Trump administration, quashing six grand jury subpoenas issued by the Justice Department against Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, St. Paul Mayor Kaohly Her, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty and officials from Hennepin and Ramsey counties. The ruling,...