Trump’s Idiot A.G. Just Handed James Comey a Massive Boost
0
Politics

Trump’s Idiot A.G. Just Handed James Comey a Massive Boost

May 4, 2026
Scroll

Posted 3 hours ago by

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche admitted Sunday that “86 47” isn’t a serious threat against President Donald Trump. NBC’s Meet the Press host Kristen Welker asked Blanche what he made of the dozens of products being sold on Amazon that use the slogan “86 47,” the same slogan that landed former FBI Director James Comey with his second indictment for allegedly threatening the president.“Should individuals selling or buying ‘86 47’ merchandise be concerned that they’re going to be prosecuted by the DOJ?” Welker asked.

Trump’s Idiot A.G. Just Handed James Comey a Massive Boost

“This isn’t about a single incident,” Blanche said. “That’s posted constantly, that phrase is used constantly, there are constantly men and women who choose to make threatening statements against President Trump. Every one of those statements do not result in indictments, of course,” he added.“Just to be very clear, you are suggesting the seashells themselves are not at the root of this indictment?” Welker pressed. “No, I am suggesting that every single case depends on the investigation that’s done. And of course, the seashells are part of that case, I mean, that’s what the public sees,” Blanche said. “But without a doubt—and it should be evident by the fact that it’s been 11 months since the posting and the indictment—there is an investigation that takes place. And the result of that investigation is the indictment that was returned last week.”AG Todd Blanche tells Kristen Welker that individuals selling 86 merchandise or posting messages similar to Comey’s seashell post will not be prosecuted:“Of course not. That’s posted constantly. That phrase is used constantly.” pic.twitter.com/AQHvynlTob— Acyn (@Acyn) May 3, 2026A look at the actual indictment suggests that it really is just about the seashells. The indictment alleges that the shells were a “serious expression of intent to do harm” against the president. The document makes no mention of additional materials that supposedly contributed to the legitimacy of that threat. And as Blanche readily admitted Sunday, “86 47” is widely used by Trump’s critics and is not considered to be a serious threat in every case. So, what made this case different? Blanche didn’t bother to explain, simply pointing to the 11 months it took the DOJ to investigate a highly publicized Instagram post. It seems the only difference is who posted it: someone who Trump has decided is his enemy.

The New Republic
The New Republic

Coverage and analysis from United States of America. All insights are generated by our AI narrative analysis engine.

United States of America
Bias: left

People's Voices (0)

Leave a comment
0/500
Note: Comments are moderated. Please keep it civil. Max 3 comments per day.
You might also like

Explore More