'Resounding Defeat for Opponents of Privacy': Warrantless Spying Extension Stalls in Senate

Privacy advocates celebrated Friday after a Republican-led effort to extend warrantless spying powers failed to advance in the US Senate in the early hours of the morning, with seven GOP lawmakers joining every Democrat except Sen. John Fetterman in opposition.The failed vote was another stumble for supporters of renewing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which lets the federal government surveil the electronic communications of noncitizens located outside the US. The authority is set to lapse next Friday.Advocates have long demanded reforms to the law, noting that US intelligence agencies have relentlessly abused it to spy on Americans.Sean Vitka, executive director of Demand Progress, called Friday's vote a resounding defeat for opponents of privacy, arguing it shows that there is no path forward for FISA without a warrant requirement.Clear majorities of Americans across the nation, and in Congress, do not want the government bypassing the courts to hoover up our private, personal data, said Vitka. If the White House and congressional leadership want to renew FISA, they have to stop ignoring this obvious fact and allow votes on real privacy reforms.Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, called the vote an interim victory but warned that some senators who would have voted to advance the bill changed their vote due to President Donald Trump's selection of loyalist Bill Pulte to serve as acting director of national intelligence—a choice that drew bipartisan backlash.Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), who supports extending Section 702 spying powers, voted against advancing the FISA legislation on Friday after decrying Pulte as an enormously bad choice who is grossly unqualified.Goitein noted that Pulte, who currently heads the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), is currently under investigation by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office for misusing his position and his access to government records to trigger dubious charges of mortgage fraud against Trump’s perceived political enemies.If Pulte can do that with the limited access to Americans’ information he has as head of the [FHFA], imagine what he could do with all the authorities and capabilities of the intelligence community—including, of course, Section 702, she added. What wouldn’t make sense? Handing Section 702 to whomever Trump could nominate in Pulte’s place without ensuring that they can’t use it as a tool for domestic spying.