NY Times Concerned Abortionists Can't Kill Babies Safely

Newsflash lady abortion is murder and it's still wrong regardless of how people vote. Video by @Justine_Brooke pic.twitter.com/p82NhzVN0d — MRC Video (@mrcvideo) May 11, 2026 In a four minute rant riddled with mental gymnastics, contributor Molly Jong-Fast gloated that banning abortion pills is a “no-win situation for Republicans, who are trying to win on an issue that is wildly unpopular.” Given that modern day progressivism is a self-consumed ideology that employs “any means necessary” as a winning strategy, it’s no surprise its subscribers can’t understand why others would prioritize a win for human lives over a win for politics. If banning pseudo-doctors from ending those lives is so “wildly unpopular,” then pro-aborts like Jong-Fast should have no problem with the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe Vs. Wade, which leaves the decision up to voters in every state. Nevertheless, she continues lamenting how hard a post-Roe America will be for mothers to end their child’s life with drugs like mifepristone and misoprostol. If SCOTUS reverses their temporary ruling that allows nationwide access to the deadly cocktail, she complains “it can still be pulled from the market” despite being FDA-approved, because “ideologically, this government doesn’t like what it does.” Correct it kills people. But according to Jong-Fast, “making abortion illegal doesn’t stop abortions; it just stops safe ones.” In other words, making murder illegal doesn’t stop people from being murdered It just stops them from being murdered safely. Justine Brooke Mon, 05/11/2026 - 17:28 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title NY Times Debates GOP Risks Over Abortion Pill Bans in Post-Roe America CNS Commentary Off