'More Destruction of Science': Trump Fires Every Member of US National Science Board

One fired board member, chemist Willie May, told The New York Times that he was disappointed but not entirely surprised, adding, I have watched the systematic dismantling of the scientific advisory infrastructure of this government with growing alarm, and the National Science Board is simply the latest casualty.The NSB sets the policies of the US National Science Foundation (NSF), approves major funding decisions for NSF, and advises Congress and the president on policy matters related to science and engineering.Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), the ranking member of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, said in a statement Saturday that this is the latest stupid move made by a president who continues to harm science and American innovation.“The NSB is apolitical, said Lofgren. It advises the president on the future of NSF. It unfortunately is no surprise a president who has attacked NSF from day one would seek to destroy the board that helps guide the foundation. Will the president fill the NSB with MAGA loyalists who won't stand up to him as he hands over our leadership in science to our adversaries? A real bozo the clown move.Alondra Nelson, an academic who resigned from the NSB last May over concerns of political interference, wrote on social media that history will not look kindly on this administration for many reasons, but the systematic silencing of independent expertise is particularly troubling.Since the start of his second term, Trump and his deputies have assailed science across the federal government, including by eliminating the Environmental Protection Agency's scientific research arm and firing experts en masse.In the coming fiscal year, Trump has proposed cutting NSF's budget by nearly 55. Additionally, the president's budget would eliminate funding for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, Scientific American reported. The White House plan, if approved by Congress, would also slash NASA's budget by nearly 25.This is how the US loses its scientific leadership—with a reckless budget line, Leigh Stearns, a glaciologist at the University of Pennsylvania, told Scientific American.