Democrats File Sweeping Lawsuit to Stop 'Unlawful' Trump Attack on Mail-In Voting

They recognized the menace it would pose to ordered liberty and the ways in which it would corrode self-government like an acid... They left most election authority with the states, permitted state regulations to be displaced only upon the agreement of both chambers of Congress, and established an independent judiciary to repel threats to individual rights.The complaint then dives into the contents of Trump's order, which it says seeks to impose radical changes to the manner and conditions under which citizens may cast absentee or mail-in ballots, and would imminently threaten to disenfranchise lawful voters.Specifically, the lawsuit argues that Trump is asking the US Postal Service to take actions unrelated to the agency's statutory mandate that run roughshod over established protections for voters who rely on the mail to exercise their fundamental right to vote in US elections.Given that the order doesn't stem either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself, the complaint continues, it is an unlawful exercise of authority that must be declared invalid.A joint statement released by Democratic leaders, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), accused Trump of trying to restrict mail-in voting as a last-ditch effort to stop voters from ousting his Republican congressional allies.The American people are fed up with Republicans’ price-spiking, healthcare-gutting agenda and are ready to vote them out, they said. That’s why Donald Trump is desperately trying to rig our elections by making it harder to vote for seniors, Americans with disabilities, members of the military, rural communities, and other working families who rely on vote-by-mail. This move is blatantly unconstitutional, and we will fight against it.Shortly after the Democrats filed their lawsuit, the Campaign Legal Center and Democracy Defenders Fund filed a complaint against the Trump executive order on behalf of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), Secure Families Initiative, and Arizona Students’ Association.Danielle Lang, vice president of voting rights and the rule of law at the Campaign Legal Center, said that the suit was necessary to block Trump's unprecedented effort to unconstitutionally assert total authority over our elections.Attempts to command the US Department of Homeland Security to work with independent agencies on efforts to disenfranchise eligible voters... are simply unconstitutional and violate long-standing protections for Americans, Lang added.Elections expert Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, argued in a Wednesday op-ed for Slate that lawsuits against Trump's executive order would probably prove successful and that it likely will be found unconstitutional by courts.However, Hasen also warned that the order could still create enough chaos and uncertainty to throw the outcome of close elections into doubt.Trump is engaging in election denialism theater, Hasen explained. It makes voters of all sides mistrust the election process and the virtues of democracy. It convinces his supporters that Democrats have to cheat to win, something that will come in handy should Democrats take back control of the House in November with the intent of beginning investigations and potentially impeachment.