Appeals court limits abortion pill access

The state argued the federal rules undermined its laws protecting unborn human life and caused it to spend Medicaid funds on emergency care for women harmed by mifepristone.A lower court judge ruled last week that mail-order prescriptions for mifepristone should continue while the Food and Drug Administration finishes a safety review of the drug. What they're saying: Reproductive rights advocates said the appeals court ruling will curtail nationwide access to necessary care. At a time when families are struggling to afford basic needs like housing, groceries and child care, it is unconscionable to restrict lifesaving access to abortion medication, said Regina Davis Moss, CEO of advocacy group In Our Own Voice.Reinstating in-person dispensing requirements would force people to travel farther, take more time off work, and absorb costs that are simply too high. The Supreme Court threw out a challenge to the mifepristone rules in 2024, finding that doctors who pressed the case lacked legal standing.What's ahead: An emergency appeal to the Supreme Court is likely, per the Guttmacher Institute.